Nurse! Count Duckula is out again!30 Sep 2018 08:22
Interesting discussion earlier. Reso makes an assertion (not a fact): "One should really try to keep the scale of this project in proportion, to what it really is". So very much a glass half empty person? He implies the gas field is really not worth bothering with and cites the cost of getting the gas out.
The figures given for the size of the gas field are assumptions based on wells drilled some decades ago. Since then the technology has improved considerably and the current thinking is that the gas field is larger and goes deeper than previously thought. We all also know gas prices have risen considerably meaning the gas field is now worth somewhat more than previously thought. The actual figures are not really relevant as they are estimates and cautious ones at that. These estimates have also changed with new technology and is a reason why I don't bandy figures about. Estimates and large changes to those estimates don't make for any accuracy.
Oil or gas fields anywhere in the World have generally produced more than originally estimated. Most were predicted to be completed depleted by now but are still producing through stimulation. I read books in the 1970's where oil was predicted to run out completely by the turn of the century. What happened to that prediction?
Gas is now realised to be a more environmentally friendly method of energy usage compared to coal and especially compared to the old brown coal used in East Germany decades ago.
So whether the objections are on environmental grounds or on economic grounds they don't really hold water. Unfortunately PG11a does hold water and Slovenia needs to concentrate on cleaning up the gas flow from that well and re-opening other wells, rather than just opposing this project. That way they will get cleaner gas, taxation for the government and income for the country. So another win win situation.