RE: Starks have not delivered8 May 2024 13:09
Acker/Martinigirl - I agree.
My tuppenceworth fwiw is that jeopardy for holders continues. Can't see GR getting this over the line without further, substantial cash needed. Very disappointing that there is still quite a list of issues to be resolved. Very disappointing that they're not yet producing SC6 consistently with the plant running continuously and that they need an addition to the plant.
On the matter of GR - ultimately he is responsible for the mess. It was his decisions that got us here. Someone has suggested that he was too proud to seek the right help - I think the word to use is hubris. He clearly is an intelligent man but I think he set out, with the encouragement of Snowking and others, on a path that was untested. Personally, I think he would have been intimately involved with the plant design. Hate to say 'I told you so' but we would all be a huge amount richer if GR had gone for a JV with a more experienced outfit and with Prem being the junior partner.
As for Stark - yes they did 'shoot the lights out' but not in a good way and GR is still floundering in the dark.
I'd say that the odds have shifted and that current shareholders might lose out significantly if he can't make good progress in the next month or so.