Member Info for Starvinmarvin

For a week over Jethro her LAT was 08 14 54.94. Maybe when it's free ...

I'll leave that up to noix to calculate. 6 minutes of change from her drilling position over Jethro is roughly 6 nautical if she were located at the equator, but once again, I'm a landlubber and in over my head here.

In all the excitement does anyone really care ... as of 2:54 UTC
N 08 08' 46.20" W 057 16' 40.18"
Subject to correction by itsyou ; )
TSX-V opens @ 9:30 am.

According to her noon report she is still over Jethro. She either moved and came back or perhaps 'Marine Traffic' isn't worth much.

The position in upper right hand corner matches what I last posted in respect to degrees and minutes. The previous position was different , the difference noix calculated in kilometres.

Sorry, that s/h read ~ 37 klicks.

noix, Tullow's 'Jethro-1 Well Result' report, Slide 4, would suggest Jethro-1 and Joe are ~ 27 klicks apart. This is very rough and those slides are illustrative at best but do the change in co-ordinates correspond roughly to that distance.

Marine Traffic Data reports Midnight Position of Stena Forth unchanged from the co-ordinates reported for her Noon Time Position yesterday. Midnight Position report time was 2019-08-18 03:38 UTC, her speed at the time .1 knots.
Can we assume she has stopped over Joe drill site?

Her noon position … Long 08 08 46.17 Lat 057 16 40.22
Is that a significant change in terms of miles?

UTC is currently 11:47, there should be a new report issued soon but I may not be home.

Thank you, I only surmised that she had moved but didn't know how far.

Position Lat/Lon: 8.14616° / -57.27784° , the position of drill location.
Her speed at midnight was just .2 knots. Not much but then they aren't going far. Could this be due to their not needing to secure everything like they would for a transatlantic voyage at greater speeds?

Stena Forth Midnight Position: N 08 08' 44.99" - W 57 16' 40.18"
I'm a landlubber but I'd say she has moved since her noon position yesterday.

Maverick, I'm still not 100% sold on the QP issue unless I've missed a press release from Georgetown. In your scenario will Eco go at the same time or post Tullow farm-out?

oilheadgame, that was my take from the last interview. He made it clear production was possible and we'd go that route if Eco didn't receive his price for a take-out.

Also, we have a smaller population and GDP than California. When we dip below a pound it'll be your turn.

Many here aren't familiar enough with the Venture. I've tried many times to have you chaps ignore it but for some it just doesn't work. I've seen this stock taken down big time on just 8 shares, to which I've chocked up to mms settling accounts. Today is different of course, there is a recession coming and our economy mainly depends on oil, raw materials and the banks. I'm afraid your turn is coming also, October 31, good luck with that one mates.

Olderandwiser
I hope Gil Holzman and company stay focused on their MO and don't get caught up in the recent heady atmosphere of success. No debt is why I stayed so long with Eco and any talk of debt and I'm gone.
Lets get out of Guyana clean and wealthy and get on with Namibia. 5 GBP is my price.

By the same token, if the Lower Cretaceous has been proven why drill the Upper Cretaceous next, ie, Joe. Too late to re-schedule?

Congrats to all Eco holders this morning!
'hereandthere/now' and 'itsyou', a big thanks for sharing your time and knowledge on 'stockhouse'. A nod to 'olderandwiser' who like myself was more than likely in too deep but had the moxy to stay long and help me hold the course. The Cotswold here I come!!!