Member Info for Stan36

DonBroco that's only the result of dilution due to warrants

He should have his shares confiscated for filing late and given to those on the holders list. From the bottom up in a socialist distribution curve

🦄🦄🦄

Price on date 1st threshold was crossed was 0.1125p

Price on date 2nd threshold was crossed was 0.305p

Chimers that is incorrect.

Must report when threshold is crossed.

It's a deliberate decision by the stock exchange to not require the buy/sell label from brokers. Looking at it another way, it is data that they want stripping out.

Other stock exchanges use this data. Far more accurate.

So....the ability to report it 100% accurately exists. The question is why would this be witheld from private investors. One for MPs to challenge I'd say.

Thankyou for your feedback Tiddlerontheroof

This judgment may make you feel aloof

Your 4 point 046 million is contributory proof

That you'll feel even more so when CapAI goes POOOOF 🚀

Share price is up 42.7% in 1 week

Last Tuesday 0.41p

Now 0.585p

The market is anticipating significant news IMHO

👾👾👾

From steady ground to skies above,

The news will lift the stock we love.

For all you in the CapAI cult

Get ye ready to catapult

🦄🦄🦄

Jeg vet ikke hva det er. Norwej2.

Men noe sier meg at jeg ikke tror deg.

FALSK NYHETER

💩💩💩

80 users of this share discussion have declared the following holdings over time. Some may have since sold, others may be made up, I make no judgment, just keep a tally (except I did not add Immanuell who declared 50m becuase dubious character and no TR1

503.5m shares which is 25.8% of the free float and 13.9% of the company.

Well done to all holders - what a fabulous rise today.

Name Holding (millions)

JjerseyGirl 38

Bah1 30

Notready1 27

WongaFC 25

Noswil 20

Stan36 19

Chimers 16

MammaC 16

AR2812 15.5

Jetaim 15.5

Stocktow 11

Rabbithole 10.5

Fyoz 10.1

Crownos 9

Wcoullyahoocom 8.5

Mmaker 8

mukdoon96 7.8

Dalboy77 7.8

Abbysabbys 7.6

Elon-Boom 7.5

Dpend 7.35

Hogbog 7.3

Eastgmt 7.1

Savvyinvestor65 6.5

Heisenb3rg 6.2

Kipper6x6 6.2

Dreamtheatre 6

Smiffy 5.7

MadMag 5.6

Insidein4 5.447

Carpo1601 5.3

HiBiy 5.2

IslandGirl 5

PompeyM 5

Somtam67 5

CB1984 5

Radika 5

Happy Cynic 5

Garymbrock & wife 4.6

Growmorecash 4.3

Yummmum 4.2

Tiddlerontheroof 4.046

Ilfitz 4

LadyBolley 4

Jthom 3.5

Jollypaddleboard 3.346

Hitthebigtime (TopGun) 3

johnski 3

Milkman87 2.95

Hemdaisa 2.64

JennyTulwought 2.55

RHWillcoll 2.3

KoolKat15 2.3

SharesToBuy 2.2

Shmokenn 2.2

Mpencoll 2.1

Quickwin08 2.1

Goodlife 2

Noswej 2

Warrie 2

SWAT77 2

Metallica 2

Carlos81 2

MG01 1.7

Bear132 1.7

Pistolknight 1.7

TheLongRoad 1.5

Chaebol 1.5

Highland 1.4

Cheety23 1.4

LeweyLewis 1.2

5h1t-or-bust 1.1

Nomlas 1

PeteW987 1

Jam96p 1

Morrie940 1

CliveBixby 0.58

Markthepark 0.3

Millie99 0.275

Jay2339 0.15

Helped methinks by last week's shorter whose strategy to manipulate the price down failed 2 days in a row. Now maybe continuing to buy back those millions 🤠

Along with more new investors no doubt.

The momentum is there leading up to significant announcements surrounding the 22nd event.

Noted MammaC - duly added to the list 🤓

This holding takes the total LSE declared holders to 79, holding 497.96m shares which is 25% of the free float

🦄🦄🦄

Many companies fail because the owners/directors gobble the cash themselves and otherwise spend it lavishly like there's no tomorrow. Government grants and cash from shareholder placing. It's easy to spend someone else's money.

With CapAI the shareholder-directors are not remunerated. Payment on results through their own shareholdings and warrants in future.

Dr Nag's experience gives me confidence CapAI will not fail. It can hardly "run out of cash" plus we are only at the very beginning of this pioneer's journey. Still on the pathway to launching the first product, formalising 2 others and announcing more.

Failure risk is minimised with diversification of the CapAI portfolio of unifawns.

Mcap < £20m and the potential is huge.

🦄🦄🦄

Interesting. Could be an error? Or are companies obliged to disclose shares held by the board and significant others so it's based on that.

I worked the other way (based also on what some posters were saying on here) - added up the BOD and Mr Crucefix because his holding is "strategic"and subtracted all that from 3.6b to leave about 2bn.

One RNS referred to "unconnected investors" when some shares were issued, about 471 million I recall.

GPT>>

On the London Stock Exchange (LSE), the free float of a company means the proportion of its shares that are freely available for public trading — excluding those held by owners who are unlikely to trade them regularly.

The FTSE Russell rules (which govern LSE index eligibility) define and calculate it roughly as follows:

---

1. Identify the total shares in issue

Start with the company’s total issued share capital.

---

2. Exclude restricted holdings

These are shareholdings not considered part of the public float, including:

Directors’ and senior executives’ holdings (and their connected persons).

Strategic holdings — generally, any single shareholder holding ≥5% is deemed strategic, unless the shareholder is a public investment fund or similar widely held institution.

Extra note:

For FTSE indices (like FTSE 100, 250), there’s a minimum free float requirement (e.g., 25% for UK incorporated companies).

@joo1 well predicted. It's touched 1400p already today

@abbysabbys well done

@5h1t-or-bust I have you on 1,156,000 correct?

77 declared investors are now collectively holding over 475m shares which is over 24% of the free float and over 13% of the issued share capital.

🦄🦄🦄

Me too. Just bought 400,000 at 0.4596 in SIPP

Ask is rising.

🦄🦄🦄

@AR2812 a very good position to be in. Well done and good luck.

@notready1 I doubt that - I've been testing bid and ask quotes for both large buys and large sells whilst monitoring trading on this share.....for months. Today for example all the sells (except delayed ones I can't track in real time) match the bid quoted to me.

This certainly looks like a pattern of manipulation to me. Enough evidence to arouse suspicions at any rate.

Anyway the FCA have the records at their disposal. They can demand buy/sell tags from brokers. And names 🤓

🦄🦄🦄

Muldoon96 if done to knowingly manipulate a stock with a plan to buy back is illegal. The critical distinction is if it's done to benefit another position.

One can sell in anticipation of a stock falling, then buy back if and when it does. For example prior to the planned release of results. But in law what is critical and very clear is the intention to benefit another position through your own actions.

Doing this repeatedly is much worse. It's very easy for the FCA to spot it following an allegation. Especially in illiquid stocks.

If you dispute that then may I respectfully suggest you check yourself.

🦄🦄🦄

Fabulous. Thanks for the disclosure.

It seems a seller is attempting to manipulate the price down again, personally short it, maybe to benefit another position (a spread bet?, a plan to buy back lower?)

That would of course be illegal.

It's certainly getting more difficult to do. 8m net sells so far and the bid has hardly shifted. Thanks in part by wholesome buyers like your goodself Insidein4

If this indeed is one seller's strategy they may come to regret it. Prosecutions have happened before and have included paying back all profits made by this underhand method

Even multiple cycles of manipulating an illiquid stock in this way - selling heavily then repeatedly buying black lower, is illegal as it benefits another position - one with foresight and a plan. And is done personally.

Shorting can only legally be done through official instruments. Not personally with buying back in repeating cycles.

Oh well we will see how it plays out. As sticky LTH-ers increase, such a strategy will become more difficult and insignificant.

🦄🦄🦄