Member Info for Ssccss

Well I've been looking into it and it does seem they would need further shareholder approval if they wanted to issue new shares or for an RTO. So unless anyone know otherwise, that's my current thinking. So at the moment the only resolution I am keen to vote no to is the SL being reappointed.

And what about an RTO, does it exclude that?

Exactly...The Directors are authorised to take all such actions and do all such things as they

may consider necessary or desirable to implement the proposals set out in that report.

Therefore it must cover issuing new shares without further approval.

Delta, surely 8 covers issuing more shares

Zag, one of the resolutions... I think 8...is literally they can do whatever they like without shareholder approval. So that probably includes the 50% of nobel US to SL and possibly the RTO to RMD.

Roland needs to face shareholders. Things could potentially improve here if the deal looks like it's going to go through and Roland actually finds a CCS partner. Plus he promises no more dilution until they have a CCS plan. Also is anyone at synergia actually an expert on CCS?

If he wants shareholders to support his transition towards CCS only then we need more transparency. Plus a JV partner, otherwise it's dead. Maybe there are potential partners but they want syn to have some cash... Roland needs to speak up.

I agree it does look like an RTO.

Delta why does SL want 50% of nobel US? If its worth nothing?

"There must be value somewhereToday 11:05

Otherwise why would RMD be in the picture as well as Mendez joining and sticking around, as he hasn't been paid so why bother?*

well exactly Zag!

*deal

Zag, why are you expecting more than 1p? The JV delay is gone and SL will have taken half ppp assets and written down 7m... You have all lost your money anyway.

Same novice trader. At the moment it's a definite no for that one and the one about keeping SL.

Protect your capital? Stop barking up the wrong tree then... Why on earth are you wasting your time speaking to me. Speak to ppp /SL. Posting here is not protecting your capital. You are totally deluded.

Go away ASI. You are no better than NU. Lost my respect completely. Knock yourself out with your AI technicallites. That's all you can do. Powerless.

Sorry, wrong paste... I was referring to this...

It seems you’re set on voting the board out and rejecting the deal, as ATrades suggests, and you’re okay with losing your investment. You’ve made your stance clear, so go ahead, make your decision, and breathe easy knowing you’ve chosen your preferred outcome. Unless alternatives arise, I’ll be voting yes, because at the end of the day, a penny or two per share is better than nothing at all.

This is just total nonsense and sums up your ability to reason - I did think you actually had some nouce at one point. Sadly I was mistaken.

"Vote no and you wave the company and your investment bye bye."

AGAIN, ARE YOU LITERALLY AI.... I MEAN WHEN DID I ACTUALLY SAY THAT??? YOU ARE THE KING OF ASSUMPTIONS.

You keep harping on about all the directors being removed but each one has a separate vote. So I really don't know why you are labouring the point. I will definitely be voting SL out unless he has something up his sleeve to help ppp come back in a positive way.

"Vote no and you wave the company and your investment bye bye"

Again, ridiculously simplistic and meaningless. Vote no to what? There's 8 resolutions.

Let’s be clear: "SL has already outlined the only viable deal currently on the table,"

Did he really? This is your first assumption that maybe incorrect.