Member Info for Ssccss

What we need to is have it clarified in plain English by SL at the investor meet.

Exactly my point delta. AI really has to checked and double checked again.

NU, for the millionth time, I'm not part of the TG group. But you know that.

It's beyond disgraceful really. Imagine being Roland, raking in a lovely salary for doing nothing but misleading people so they invest in your business. Sad state of affairs.

That's my gut feeling too gasman. I don't want to risk it. If that's not the case, he can explain in detail what resolution 8 is during the investor meet.

How do you know that gasman? It's very vague to me, I couldn't figure it out either way. How can we get more clarity?

It could be Zag. I hope it is. I still don't like the fact it's on Ukraine at all, practically I don't see how that's feasible with the ongoing war and potential damage to the infrastructure. It's also not a firm commitment so it could disintegrate at any point. I also don't like the fact we will be diluted so much, it's unlikely we will get out with much money at all. So it will take a lot to convince me, not just marketing spiel.

How are those questions pointless? You are so bizarre NU.

Let's see what the investor meet says but so far I'm not convinced at all.

I agree affrm. Madness. I think the last date is 3rd Nov

I wonder if it was to sweeten the CCS India project... You scratch my back...

Gordon, I'm sorry but it's syns issue. There should have been protections within the agreement. That was Rolands job. He didn't do it, either knowingly or he's incompetent.

Exactly Gordon. It's infuriating and I don't know how Roland can get away with thinking he just going to take the pittance he sold our asset for and plough it into his salary for doing nothing for next few years. Diabolical.

Zag, don't shoot the messenger.

NU, that's your definition of a good RNS. Wow your bar is low.

Zag, don't read the board then or filter affrm. You're being unreasonable.

"active" is the key word here and you are backtracking. Please filter me.

AGAIN... If nobel US has no assets, what on earth does SL want with 50% of them in return for writing off a £4m loan?

May I just ask you something... Have you not learned a very important piece of information from me today? An error in one of your fundamental assumptions? Obviously, no value to you. Go ahead and filter me.

Whatever ASI.