Member Info for Ssccss

If Quint is back as NovumBoy, that doesn't bode well for the SP.

I thought I saw a pattern repeating itself.

Have to say...all these "supposedly" new posters are a slight concern. We all know what happened last time.

It's disappointing Gordon, but things don't always work out the way we expect. Things could work out better...or worse. No point dwelling really. Either you're in it for the ride or not.

I don't understand the SP either but it's not rational, its emotional. Current market is bad, people more risk averse, oex has been a let down for years. I'm guessing people just don't want to take the risk. Good news is the SP is low and so it's a great opportunity for those who have money they can afford to lose.

Question is...when to buy to bring my average down...

This is getting painful...

Progress! Makes my life easier

I derisked a while ago as these things are always a gamble. I still have a good amount of shares so fingers crossed. I'm surprised as the minimal interest so far. I do hope if there is good news that it is communicated well and draws some attention.

Syn is still not appearing on Google finance either!

"Could" underpin
"Once" decline rates are determined to be satisfactory

I don't think that's encouraging. It's meaningless. It just says the procedure wasn't a failure and they achieved the refrac. Therefore Schlumberger and oex have not made an errors etc... there have been no obstacles etc...BUT whether the field is commercially profitable is still very much unknown.

I have to say, I do find the recent RNS's a little concerning. I hope they are very clear as to the implications of the figures they quote in the next RNS. I also hope there are no more "could- depending on" type statements. Mean absolutely nothing and are therefore pointless unless we have enough evidence.

Initial indications are that the revised fraccing methodology employed on the C-77H re-frac operation has been effective and could underpin a full field development, subject to funding, once the decline rates have been determined to be satisfactory.

Looks still very up in the air. Not sure what the point of the RNS today is.... still too many unknowns.

I have no idea what to make of the last 2 RNS's...

You will still be able to see the oex documents under oex.

Gordon they don't gave anywhere to put the old syn records... they have to remain under syn I would think. That's why I'm saying we should have chosen a different ticker.

They can't remove it because they have to keep a record for the company that was previously called syn. I mean it could work in oex favour as new investors won't see all the dilution and legal wrangling unless they go and look at oex. Fresh slate. Let's hope it's good news from here. I would really like to see the price on google though.

I hope so Gordon but I have a feeling they know and just aren't bothered. I also cannot believe it still isn't showing on google finance. Why did they pick a ticket that had already been used so recently.

Google finance still doesn't recognise SYN in london.

It doesn't work on Google finance. Can't get sp.