Member Info for Ssccss

This clearly states it's a legal requirement but I haven't read far enough to see if there are any exemptions.

Https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/430

"CA 2006 introduced a requirement for quoted companies to publish their accounts on a website (s. 430).". Apparently.

To be fair, just to say ii are really good in terms of customer service. Wish all companies behaved the same.

Apparently, that's the only way they could fix it. Sorted now.

So I have two voting entries showing now.

Now I have had another vote for ppp appear in my ii mailbox and it states not voted. On phone to ii now. Am I really the only one having issues?

Feels like a long old wait until the vote closes and we get an update...

I missed this error when I voted last week but luckily I check it this morning to check the expiry date and noticed the number of available to vote on was wrong.

Mine went through no problem but the number of shares detailed on the from and on the confirmation was incorrect. Much less than I actually hold.

I would suggest everyone checks their voting form and voting confirmation shows the correct number of shares you hold.

No affrm, they can't do that. Interactive investor has now submitted my no vote with the correct number of shares. I couldn't do it through the voting form.

Has no else had that issue??

It should be one vote per share!

Well ii have now put my vote through with the correct number of shares. They are going to query it with ppp plus the agm/gm issue.

Please check your voting forms to ensure you have the correct number of shares showing!!!! Mine would have been significantly reduced to almost half the shares I actually have!!!!

Something dodgy going on imo.

I'll give them a call but just wondering if others have 1 vote per share showing on their voting form?

Isn't one vote per share standard? What do others have? Will Lunn have one vote per share?

Isn't one vote per share standard? What do others have? Will Lunn have one vote per share?

On my voting form it states shares available as 306k, why when I have over 500k?

Coxy, we invested based on the RNS's, which were apparently incorrect so I don't agree with your viewpoint at all.

Voting yes really is too irrational and nonsensical for words.