Member Info for SpotTheNutters

The commercial information, which. stood out, was clear in the RNS

______

'the Company is in *** a unique position *** as it provides both short and long-loop rare earth permanent magnet recycling. HyProMag USA's proposed U.S. facility fully meets the requirements of the U.S. Defence Production Act ("DPA") Title III and will provide a secure, long-term, commercial-scale magnet recycling and production facilities in the United States."

__________

MKA meets the criteria to be a supplier for the US DODefence

We already know MKA meets the criteria to be a supplier to the Uk MOD

Given the two known facts above, it's obvious it will meet the criteria to be a supplier for the EU's Defence too.

Uk Annual Defence spend - £65 Billion

USA Annual Defence spend - $ 1 Trillion ( £750 Billion]

EU Annual Defence spend - $ 1.4 Trillion ( £1,200 Billion)

MKA's customers being lined up, have enormous budgets and spending power. 😀

GLR

That's part of the liars' arsenal or more aptly, writing from it's a.r.s.e.hole.

In the RNS:

'Brittany Kaiser is a leading global authority on digital asset rights, data protection and blockchain technologies.

She was a co-founder of one of the world's largest bitcoin companies, Gryphon Digital Mining (now American Bitcoin, Nasdaq: ABTC)'

A co-founder of a company now valued at over $ 7 Billion.

In the sector that HAMA are now pushing forward in, with a current valuation of roughly £ 20 Million.

She'll be a superb asset to steer HAMA's growth, already knowing how to set up a company worth $ Billions in the same commercial space.

Brilliant !

'the Company is in *** a unique position *** as it provides both short and long-loop rare earth permanent magnet recycling. HyProMag USA's proposed U.S. facility fully meets the requirements of the U.S. Defence Production Act ("DPA") Title III and will provide a secure, long-term, commercial-scale magnet recycling and production facilities in the United States."

A unique position.

So, not only is it suitable for US Department of Defence criteria, we already know it's suitable for Uk's MOD criteria from the MOD's Industrial Strategy Document ten days ago, which by default will mean, it will meet the EU's Defence criteria.

The US defence budget from 2026 is roughly $ 1 Trillion per annum, which is roughly $ 2.75 Billion each day, every day.

We also already know that the EU's Defence budget over the next ten years is roughly $ 14 Trillion Euros, which is roughly $ 4 Billion each day, every day, for the next ten years !

Excellent position for MKA to be in.

Stock

Feel free to ask him on X why he hasn't included MKA's greener recycled RE Magnet production in the Uk, the upcoming Hub in Germany and the three Hubs planned in the US.

I'm not on X, so wouldn't have the opportunity to do that. I know that Andy Home is on X, because there's a link to his profile. He's definitely British, I listened to him speaking on a Metals podcast.

Stock

Are you referring to Andy Home ?

If so, he's on X and he's British, so considering MKA's recycled RE Magnet producing Hub is the greenest process and in the Uk, that doesn't suggest he's very well researched.

I can't see the piece being sponsored, because he's highlighting a number of companies. Multi company sponsorship 'collaboration' isn't the norm. and RE's as a sector don't need sponsoring.

Well worth bringing him up to speed though.

Here it is again, All The Sheet, the tedious thread 'parasite' trying to keep it's post title alive and explain away it's boolsheet.

Deluding itself that others believe the boolsheet and falsely assuming that it's chosen agenda, as an irritant and doubt caster, isn't transparent to almost every reader. That delusion alone raises a question about it's level of intelligence.

Trading or investing, which is simply trading over a longer term, can be profitable for anyone if the timing is right and the selected stocks have a future positive sentiment to a large enough audience, but there has never been a need to try to cast doubt to other investors about their own chosen interest, to make a healthy profit.

On other threads, it does exactly the same and includes peddling it's own financial interests simultaneously. This thread infester has form. It can't help itself, it's a personal choice it makes, enjoying casting doubt for others on the one hand and promoting it's own interests on the other hand.

This isn't about having a sound trading strategy, it's just about poor character.

Nothing more, nothing less.

All The Sheet

If you bothered to read the posts on the thread, rather than repeatedly writing sheet, you'd already know the answers to such basic questions.

Keep the commentary coming, Esd 👍

Not written by me, below, but here's one way the process works but there are several, including your financial institution working across multiple exchanges that you mentioned.

________

Many top non-U.S. companies use American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) for dual listing. An ADR represents the foreign shares of the company held in trust by a custodian bank in the company’s home country and carries the same rights of the shares.

Just to remind everyone.

This, combined with his mistrust of M McNulty, was on his recent intro to the thread, his 'source' of assumptions relating to a placing, from X private chats.

He wrote:

'I belief myles has been selling some of his stock in anticipation of a fundraise. Thats what I've heard this morning from more than one source on X private chats etc'

On the same day, M McNulty wrote on X:

"My account was hacked over the past 48 hours, while I was on a road trip down to Italy and hardly checking the markets, let alone X. If you have any private messages from me since Thursday, please ignore!"

What he's banking on is that an alleged message written by M McNulty might have been 'forwarded' to people from the hack rather than it being a false message created by a hacker.

You get the point, he hasn't a clue whether there's a placing or not. Nobody has, except MKA personnel.

The price is sitting on the 50 DMA (different for the EMA), so the description 'rejecting it' is both ambiguous and boolsheet.

There are a host of different prices that have acted as both support and resistance on the ascent, so this 25p figure is 'plucked' from the ether, in a personal trading position 'wish', as if to suggest there is nothing between 34p and 25p and is once again, boolsheet.

The repeated reference to 'the placing' as if it's a known fact is, you guessed it folks, yet more boolsheet.

None of us can say with 100% certainty, whether or not, or when, a placing would ever occur on any stock, including the boolsheeter.

Thanks for the candid response.

Understood.

Tomhuk2000

Based on your speculation, how do you see this possibility relating to future potential valuations of HAMA ?

I'm guessing you've hypothesised on the numbers in the event of your hunch coming to fruition ?

Fineprint

Your chosen name is now fully understood !

A wordsmith, hilarious ! That made me laugh.

😂

Esd

Excellent.

All we need now is the conclusion and confirmation of the Japanese MKA Recycling Hubs and we'll have the full suite, courtesy of Japan.

😀

All The Sheet

You're not saying it but you just thought you'd mention it.

That old chestnut.

Trot on, scrounger.

You having lost a significant sum in PPP, Zag, makes your bitterness understandable.

Trying to get everyone else to share in that though, isn't reasonable.

Welcome back, Esd ! 👍

I think it's more a case of 'when', not if.

If you analyse that statement:

'In addition, *** by investing in *** advanced recovery and refining processes and advanced manufacturing, *** we will *** also position the UK as a global leader in critical mineral recovery and reclamation'.

In other words, 'we will be investing in'.

MKA is the only show in town in the category.