Member Info for Spikeyj

15:43,

lithium, titanium and graphite are not rare earth minerals

… “a bit of research perhaps”, lol.

11:01, looks like the return of dattttabssse.

Meanwhile, from a Dshox approved source [The Times], a little light reading that touches on the idea of the moral injury in this war,

https://www.thetimes.com/article/dd471a8e-303d-4a62-a24e-42a239007f20?shareToken=ac6b8a90fd36744290c8b98e23d44587

Thanks l/b, refreshing to see something sensible about the company itself.

Weird how you guys really don’t seem to care what this useless company has done with your money. … still, your cash so it’s up to you what you do with it. i think george best made wiser choices.

(weird also, tho’ mildly amusing, just how little punter understands about defamation.)

Send it all you like … it’s on topic and factual (and strange imv that so few on here seem to care where that $26m is).

[… evening, king, hope you are yours are well.]

[soz, ‘unspecified’]

… no sensible answers anywhere, not from the company

nor from this chat board, about that errant $26 million…

? perhaps that investor webinar will provide a chance for the company to clarify where it has gone?

to recap …

- the company raised $26 million in placings, which was supposedly to fund rosgeo jv.

- but the jv did not go ahead, and the company didn’t refund the money to placees.

- so presumably (unless the company literally burnt $26m in banknotes!?) that

$26 million should still be sitting around, resting in someone’s account, somewhere …

- and yet, for some specified reason, it seems EUA couldn’t use those $26

million to avoid the sanderson convertible loan, & the subsequent placing…

so, where is that $26 million now, who is accountable for that, and

could it be used to fund mining startup at MT? (… & if not, why not?)

Me, i very much hope it does not happen, but putin still actively playing for that, and trump would have no objection.

putin wants control and domination, rather than necessarily occupation, as per e.g. belorussian vassal state.

19:04, if putin installs a puppet government in ukraine, no need for trump to care about that one way or the other so long as putin’s sock puppet still permits trump to take his payoff.

17:51, it’s an organised criminal / kleptocratic state, run mafia style by vlad … but unfortunately that also implies that when vlad goes, there will simply be other evil, exploitative candidates ready to step up and muscle in as capo di tutti capi, without great second order change for the country as a whole.

personally, i doubt that trump is particularly afraid of putin ... i suspect the problem is more that trump really does not care at all about ukraine or europe, and is simply on the lookout for some kind of greedy payout for himself and his associates. poor old europe is really struggling to let itself finally realise that trump is absolutely not our friend or ally, whatever happens in ukraine.

jmv.

Dshox, 10:19, i thought the Times was meant to be part of the evil msm?

? where did that money go, punter?

Https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn0k520v4xro

Del, you are missing the point; i commented that the RNS does not state that there will be no fundraise, because wilco had earlier falsely/dishonestly claimed that the RNS *did* say that - i.e. wilco was attempting to mislead others.

similarly, you also miss the point about mine-building … i am highlighting that the company continues to issue very vague, ambiguous RNS statements, which do not state that EUA is going to start building a mine at MT; i did that in response to fairtradetub falsely/dishonestly claiming at 09:09 that the RNS *did* say that - i.e. fairtradetub was attempting to mislead others.

… yes, licences can be extended … but usually, one would expect that if a licence is actually worth something, that any such extension would *cost*… ? so would do you imagine EUA would have to pay to go beyond 2038, if mining at MT really is a very valuable opportunity?

… as for the mining expert bit, del, that’s because you lied in your post at 09:30. you dishonestly stated that i am a “self claimed mining expert”. i have never made any claim - that was simply a lie by you.

you used to be a better poster, del, i am sorry to see you go sour like this.

10:00, sb: “… looks like beings [sic] set up for mining…”

yeah, i guess they probably do want it to *look* that way … but if you read carefully, this RNS does not say that they, or anyone else, are actually going to start building a mine.

i think EUA have been careful in their own official news to stay within the letter of the law (— tho’ various other parties have simply lied through their teeth to ramp EUA -), but EUA are pretty good at making it easy for some greedy pis to read in whatever they hope to see.

(PS del, where did I claim to be a “mining expert”? … think you are fibbing there)

You sound somewhat grumpy these days del.

I have posted this morning -

(a) that the RNS does not state that there will be no need for a raise,

(b) that the RNS does not state that they will start to build a mine,

(c) and I have noted that the licence expires 13 years from now.

… which of those things do you disagree with del ?

Fairtradetub 09:09: “… the rns reads that they are going to start to build a mine at MT…”

no, the RNS does *not* say that. … they have worded it rather carefully, as often happens on AIM…

Apols, 13 years, not 12 … 7/12/38.