Member Info for Spikeyj

That’s entirely up to you del, your choice. (similarly, i note you chose not to apologise for your blatant lie that i had claimed to be a mining expert.)

one slight difference; i was politely asking you about your strategy in relation to EUA shares, the subject of this chatboard. but you were just being nosy about my personal whereabouts and travels (i.e. nowt to do with EUA).

you used to be a polite and sensible poster del. it’s a shame you’ve gone a bit sour. hopefully 2026 will be better for you. … HNY, when it comes.

Punter, “did he say concentrate dumbo?”

yes, del did —> at 19:38, in his list of “options”.

read more carefully.

Del, i saw your list of options, but tbh i find it hard to believe you are being serious …. ? do you genuinely believe that EUA could raise 26 million by selling WK concentrate, or were you just joking about that?

By the way, del, i think i remember asking you earlier this year what your plan would be as a partially disillusioned EUA shareholder if EUA still couldn’t sell anything. i think you replied something to effect that you were willing to give them to the end of 2025 to let you exit at 10p or above (although you didn’t say what you would do if the s/p stayed lower than that).

now that we are nearing the year end, and s/p still down here, are you planning to give them another year del?

(? do you honestly believe, for instance, that EUA can raise 26 million by selling WK concentrate!?)

Who benefited from the $26 million placing money, del? — it certainly wasn’t EUA’s shareholders.

hence, cui bono?

EUA raised all that money, but then had to go begging to sanderson for far less, and with zero JV to show for it, and cash running low now.

… so where do you think EUA would find its share of sinosteel costs, del?

Punter, it’s a fairly accurate description of what people like you tend to say. but as to what that means, that’s another matter.

You appear to misunderstand what LLM AIs do, punter.

if you ask what people say about the spikeyj ID, or what people say about ‘jubbing ’, etc., [or, come to that, stretch, mac4671, del, punter, etc etc] then the AI will summarise what people have tended to post on chatboards like this.

…. however, the AI is not offering you an opinion or analysis of its own whether or not those chatboard posts are well-founded, rational, truthful, etc etc. or the very opposite …. all it does is hold up a mirror to what folks on boards like this have already tended to say.

Dshox 10:04: “With ECPF (ie Sinosteel builds and finances the construction)…”

Lorenzo06 10:24: “Wow a factual post that solely relates to EUA…”

well, not quite. dshox seems to be claiming that EUA would not have to chip in its own funds, implying that sinosteel would fully fund. but several other posters on this chatboard have previously posted that they think EUA would be liable for an 8 figure contribution from its own pockets, variously suggesting that EUA’s share of that bill would be somewhere between $26 million to $50 million.

me, I think it’s somewhat academic anyway, since i don’t think there’s a snowball’s chance in hell that the sinosteel agreement will be activated. …. but just supposing it was, where would EUA get the money to pay its share?

(…if only all that lovely rosgeo JV placing money was still available, given that the JV didn’t happen … where did it end up .. cui bono?)

unless, of course, folks prefer to believe dshox’s fairytale, that lovely old sinosteel would fund everything without EUA having to pay a penny …. hands up anyone who believes that?

“Why compare?”

c’mon, that’s a blindingly obvious ramp tactic.

… which was interesting as it indicates amit does have at least some concern that he could be located by lawyers, and then prosecuted with consequences to follow.

(if he wasn’t bothered at all about such possibilities, why would he so publicly retract that false claim? - if he thought he was entirely beyond reach, why would he care? (& come to that, if he really, really wasn’t bothered, why would he post here?)).

Mad max: wishbone road! - a post-apocalyptic AIM story.

…. hopefully starring margot robbie, with winona in a surprising yet raunchy cameo (plus one of the many hemsworths).

“Roads are not built just for sake of it”

but they haven’t built a road … just generating talk about the idea that they might, imv to excite the gullible / greedy / desperate, and try to divert attention away from their ongoing failure to disclose hard numeric assay data etc.

it’s a lenigas share, they can and will spin any kind of story whatsoever to pis to keep the plates spinning so they can get yet another placing away. he’s been doing that for decades, and he’s good at it.

PP, mt licence expires before that anyway.

Tub, how do you think EUA would pay for its share of the costs with sinosteel?

… estimates between circa $25 million to $50 million needed from EUA have been shared by others on this chat board before … but EUA doesn’t have a pot to p*ss in …. cash runs out by Easter.

(the cash from the placing for the rosgeo job might have helped, since the rosgeo jv didn’t actually go ahead … but all that 8 figure placing money seems to have gone, mia.)

Wilco questioning someone else’s thought processes … irony personified.

08:40, don’t tell him your name mr_wolfe!

… punter’s army all round…

C/g 21:48: “…even though he never actually bothered to even look at it...”

you really are remarkably gullible.

Hi punter, nah, i still think this is a completely sh*t company, with an utterly useless CEO, that doesn’t actually have a viable mining business, and pretty much exists just to sell more shares to pis to fund lifestyles of bod and their mates.

… but the company is comatose, just doing the bare minimum to try to maintain those licences that nobody wants to buy for any meaningful sum

… so there’s very little to say about EUA itself at this point, until they try to get a pump underway for the next placing (which i suspect will be *roughly* 3 months from now). nearly into the xmas marketsslowdown anyway.

…most of the chat here atm is about putin’s war in ukraine … for sure it’s an important issue, but this definitely ain’t the kind of forum for any sensible discussion about it, imv. … and it will make zero difference to the (dismal) underlying value at this useless company.

17:17: perhaps, just perhaps, trump might not be telling the truth?