Member Info for Spikeyj

It’s not really about ‘wanting this to fail’, more folks noting that there was never any meaningful, underlying business to even begin with.

it’s a bit like criticising people for hoping the tooth fairy will fail.

14:21, respect for that post.

10:28 “D.T. USA want no part of it…”

to the contrary, one of the main reasons europe wanted to freeze those 200 billion is to prevent putin from offering a share in those frozen assets as a bribe to trump to let him do what he wants.

donald is almost entirely motivated by greed and vanity. neither he nor most of those around to him care one jot about ukraine or europe, other than as potential piggy banks, customers, or targets for theft. (the unfortunate exception being the few around him who want to further promote white christian supremacism and fascism in europe).

Just factual, stan ( —-> 19:12)

He’s on the wine already, stan.

Del, china does not have a monopoly on PGMs.

Well, lack of evidence never seems to bother EUA investors, so no change there then.

(? … btw, you haven’t explained yet metals EUA have which china has a monopoly on?)

Del, as so often, you choose to misunderstand my post. my point is, we will find out, empirically, over the next few months. just sit back and watch, del.

? - that’s the fun of it, eh?

Del, I asked if you thought it was “easier” … so do you see any evidence that it is easier for them to sell meaningful quantities of concentrate, keep, remit and then deploy funds from concentrate sale, compared with when they borrowed from sanderson? … me, i see no such evidence, happy to see it if you can show it.

One of the really nice things about the stock market is one gets to see real world tests of hypotheses / concrete feedback about how companies perform,

if i understand you correctly, del, you appear to think EUA will be able to fund itself, and if needed the sinosteel deal, by selling lots of precious metals, and/or simply by selling some of its licences/assets.

i on the other hand don’t believe they can raise enough money that way, and so i believe they will need another placing (or conceivably another convertible loan) within the next few months.

fortunately, we will get to see in time which one of us is right about that, without any additional effort from either of us. bon chance!

? and do you see some evidence now that it’s much easier now for EUA to sell its “concentrate”? - tia for your links etc.

Del, you aren’t answering the question.

which metals do you believe that EUA have, which china has a monopoly (/near monopoly on)?

…. e.g. EUA does not have rare earth ores….

… e.g. china does not have a monopoly on platinum group metals…

Del, why do you think they had to take the begging bowl to sanderson for chump change, given that you seem to believe EUA could sell large amounts of valuable metals?

That’s all very lovely, del, but which of those are you claiming that (a) china have a monopoly on, and also (b) which EUA have?

… are you, for example, under the impression than china have a monopoloy on the platinum group metals?

Putting it bluntly, whe4to, the cloudtag website has stated many, many things which have turned out to be complete and utter horsesh*t.

? .. so, why do you still believe a word it says there, given the ridiculous history?

Whe4to, what do you think it means (I.e. what inferences can you draw) that amit specifically and publicly claimed that there was a deal with j&j, but then publicly and totally retracted that [28th July 2025, his own website], stating clearly not just that there was no deal with j&j, but also that j&j had never even expressed any intention to enter into any kind of deal or relationship with cloudtag whatsoever.

to me, that looks like amit was forced to retract an outright blatant lie, and i would suggest that a reasonable inference that many ordinary people might draw is that you can never trust a word from someone who lies like that.

“… the sale of potentially 700kg of metals at WK (unconfirmed and no idea on costs …)”

… which is why it was a pretty stupid question asking what such metal is worth …. time and again, EUA simply fails to provide the necessary data to clarify and confirm costs.

re US concern about “the Chinese monopoly on metals”, that’s way too general ….

…. the US concern relates to specific critical elements, which EUA simply can’t help with …. primarily, rare earth elements, plus stuff like gallium, germanium, antimony, cobalt and tungsten (? … what proven reserves of those does EUA have??)

08:42, del, don’t be silly, you’ve been around long enough to know that I’ve already answered that a fair few times over the last few years. it’s not my problem if people like you would like a different answer.

@del, who do you think did actually benefit from all that lovely rosgeo JV money?

[… hint, it wasn’t you or the other ordinary EUA shareholders … somebody else did very well from all that money, despite no JV at all to show for it.]

G’night del.

@del, why do you think they had to go begging to sanderson for peanuts to keep the lights on?

… join the dots, fellah.