Member Info for Spikeyj

That’s why they had to pay for that ACF report, and get Zak and various other klingons to get all rampy-pumpy. the ACF report was an absolute, disgraceful shocker, and an unmissable smoking gun. previous nomad couldn’t stomach the stench, and resigned. the happy clappers here try to forget that.

Hopefully untrammelled global warming will do away with the need for winter warmer subsidies to pensioners. … in the meanwhile, stay frosty, oldsters!

If the chinese wanted mineral rights to kola p, they would just tell putin to hand them over, as he is just their b*tch now … putin’s place in history is to turn russia into a vassal state of the chinese.

(but i very, very much doubt the chinese state is particularly interested in the sloppy seconds/ thirds/ left-over scraps that EUA has.)

19:24, depends, leno, are you still unable to cope with the idea that someone might say this is a lifestyle company, or have you toughened up a little?

I don’t think any of the die hards actually buy shares, they just have free rides from their magnificent hindsight trading (- nice work if you can get it).

? just to bring it back to EUA, do folks think that the prospects of a favourable deal in russia for this london-based company are rising or falling, as putin’s invasion goes beyond 900 days, finland and sweden (directly on russia’s border) have joined NATO after 70 years plus of careful neutrality, and the UK government has permitted use of UK intel, UK tanks, etc to facilitate the first invasion on russian soil since hitler in 1941?

08:36. Yup.

Speaking of glittering buckets of sand, b1ll, i heard from a usually reliable feline that the auditors have finally been able to locate the missing concentrate, with video proof circulating:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PEORpjVNJQk

Normski, it’s all a bit off-topic for AV., so not intending to get into a lengthy exchange, but issues about asylum seekers being accommodated in hotels have been around for years … that snowballed under the *conservatives*, who were in power with a big majority in the commons until pretty recently.

jury is still out whether starmer and co can do any better ( - so not intended particularly as a pro-labour post from me, let’s wait and see - ) but it’s not logical to blame labour for a mess that the conversatives created over many years — cameron, boris, truss and sunak presided over the build up in hotel usage.

19:04, oh kammy, oops - friendly fire!

read more carefully …. sandwell is one of the EUA sycophants, not one of the ‘neg-heads’.

MAB, 13:39, EUA are suspended because they failed to produce their *historic* accounts on time

even if someone had recently made them some kind of bid or proposal, that would have *zero* bearing on the preparation and publication of historic accounts.

… but of course, there are no “buyers” anyway, imv.

Https://www.thetimes.com/article/cf8c6fec-4a2c-4b2f-8694-bee6067d3fb4?shareToken=9ee89ffecc934b170437f2dd313a211b

some interesting implications re development costs in the sector.

Kammy appears to be mistakenly assuming (at 12:41) that lots of posts on a suspended share somehow indicates a belief that there is lots of value in the company in question.

deeply wrong, deeply stupid.

… back when WRN was suspended, there continued to be huge numbers of posts on LSE’s WRN chatboard (including ludicrously rampy stuff like datttttabase’s post today, lol). … for sure, there was indeed a lot of interest about what was really going on with WRN, but it absolutely didn’t mean that WRN was very valuable … quite the opposite in fact.

WRN is now long dissolved, utterly worthless, and the criminal trial of 5 people associated with the WRN fiasco is scheduled to start next month (not holding my breath, delays with complex legals always to be expected).

[wokes, not wakes, soz]

“…it’s amusing to rattle the little wakes that hate a bit of white masculinity”

? what’s any of that got to do with ctag?

Hi offler, i agree about the concentrate, am very dubious how much they really have and what it could be sold for ….but in a much broader sense i was meaning i simply don’t believe EUA’s licence areas are worth much anyway. never that much by way of fully proven up reserves from extant data, and financial viability of production/processing/distribution likely very unattractive imo.

those areas have been touted about for many years, and no-one is that interested. russkies mined out most of the good stuff that could be extracted at reasonable cost long, long ago. EUA are just stuck with the left-overs / sloppy seconds (/thirds etc, ugh).

I don’t believe that they have enough cash left, nor income coming in, to progress any significant mine works.

16:09, I’m inclined to agree offler, although additionally because i do not believe EUA has particularly valuable assets to sell in the first place, war or no war, atb.

(from my perspective, discussion on US, russkie etc politics is fine for this chatboard if people make sensible connections *with possible effects on EUA and its shares*, but if it’s just chatting about politics for its own sakes, belongs on some other platform or saloon bar.)

So do you think it will be bad news for EUA’s prospects, if trump loses the election?