Member Info for Spikeyj

(… ducking both questions, actually).

Ducking the question, leno.

Wow, and there’s me guessing that it might be about EUA v2.0 trying to negotiate a 25% working interest in a dog licence in minsk… shortly.

& while you’re in a chatty mood, leno, am curious, what made you decide recently that xmas will be the right point to exit and cut your losses? (if no mega dividend etc before that, of course)

?… do you chat and meet up with them as individuals, irl?

(tbf, i can imagine you might enjoy ‘their’ company.)

Leno, what makes you believe that?

@offler, i’m glad that you seem to have decided it’s not actually that amusing to keep engaging richard/in ‘banter’ (aka, playing his game).

Meanwhile,

October 7th

Oil up 2% so far.

The underlying problem for dim/richard/ikn is that there is nothing constructive/positive that can be said about this company with any real substance.

the best the rampers have is the idea that there will be a pre-election (US) s/p spike in anticipation of a possible trump win bringing global peace and harmony (… remember, folks, he’s the one who reneged on the deal to restrain Iranian nuclear weapon development, be care ful what you wish for…).

if anyone wants to play the trump win scenarios, perhaps good to bear in mind the old maxim, buy on rumour, sell on news.

Admin let [richard/dim/welcher —> all same person] run rings round ‘em.

If people do wish to report Richard’s repeated offensive, disruptive and off-topic posting, i would suggest emailing —-> info@lse.co.uk

… outlining the concerns about the overall pattern of his activities, rather than just clicking the report button for individual posts.

sadly, lse admin have declined to take action about richard over many months, despite reports for multiple ******, mysogynist, personally abuse off-topic posts. he’s been very blatant and prolific, so lse admin can hardly deny the nature of his postings.

going back a decade or so, i think lse admin would not have tolerated that kind of posting. but it does seem, for whatever reason (?is richard / dimitryreacts actually one of the lse admins, or a partner /relative of one of them?), that lse admin have repeatedly failed to enforce their own t&c, and collude with repeated hate speech posting from richard / dim.

sad to see how this site has deteriorated over the last few years.

Hopefully posters such as antha, HITS, B3ast& myself may have helped, at least a little, to prevent some pis from donating yet more cash to amit’s cigar & whisky fund.

same cannot be said of the willing dupes & apologists on this board, who make it all too easy for folks like amit.

Bought a slice back.

(looks like two broker downgrades ‘helped’, cheers lads.)

Sounds really nice. i would have to remind myself about all the open water stuff, got PADI’d up about 15 years ago in lombok & komodo (great reefs), but very little scuba since.

Stonetown not so good?

[though the thing that still baffles me is why you guys have waited so many years to look into legal action against cloudtag — ? why hire a lawyer now, rather than 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years ago??]

Issue would not be about suing random trolls or delusional nutters supporting amit … rather whether or not it could be evidenced that amit paid money to others to pump out deliberately misleading info about cloudtag on social media / chatboards - i.e. if it could be proven that other parties were jointly involved in an organised criminal deception, in which case they could be individually held liable for damages for their part.

Stretch claims it’s a good omen when there are few posts from ‘green boxes’, and he also claims that it’s a good omen when there are many posts from ‘green boxes’. go figure.

? Conceivably worth going after some of the shills who posted in support of cloudtag’s games on this site? - some of them may have assets / earnings worth seizing.