The problem as I see it14 Sep 2020 20:05
A positive broker note should have generated more interest than we got.
It is just my view but I think there are two problems here;
1. Negativity breeds negativity. The share price has been depressed for so long, potential investors look at the fundamentals and think they look good (as we did) but they look at the turnover of shares and the lack of interest and come to the conclusion, something is wrong here.
2. Secondly promoting internally was a big mistake. When a company has gone through a period when trust is lost, they need a new proven CEO to come in and take charge. He/She makes the statement that mistakes have been made, they will not be repeated and this is a fresh start.
Mark Reid was the co partner of Paul Welsh throughout his tenure as CEO and he should take some of the blame. They went through a big recruitment process and decided that Mark Reid was the best man for the job. He has never been a CEO before and probably thought he would never be one.
Whether you think Mark Reid is a good CEO is pretty much irrelevant because SDX has always been a partnership, initially PW and MR, now MR and NB. For all financial pundits to promote the No2 just sends out the signal that it is business as usual. All the issues and concerns they had with PW are still here with MR. He has never tackled the PW issue in any interview or presentation. He was in fact silent for almost a year before he finally did a presentration.
In conclusion, potential new investors look at the last 18 months and think if the story is so good why is nobody buying and institutional investors think nothing has chabged since the PW days and we can't trust the management, the result is the total apathy that we see in relation to SDX share turnover.