Member Info for Skippysb01

The daily SP won't tell us much. It's a great RNS, however market now thinks the sale RNS isn't coming for a while longer and that's whats driving the SP this morning. The market may well be wrong but we don't generally get 2 RNS in matter of days. If I was trading this I would have taken some profits this morning.

This is good for us..... as posted on other strand.

The answer is test at point of interest. You want to enter a location/event/workplace/cross a border you test on the spot. There are no restrictions unless you are positive.

All other solutions are flawed. Asking public to test themselves leads to fraud and lateral flow tests not reliable. PCR late test takes too long and is too expensive and leads to rise of vested interests and fraud. Vaccination passports flawed as vaccination reduces transmission and seriousness of disease but does not STOP transmission to others.

Enter Paraytec. Small, fast and accurate portable test unit at every point of interest. 'Opening up' only increases our chances because fast accurate testing allows opening up

The answer is test at point of interest. You want to enter a location/event/workplace/cross a border you test on the spot. There are no restrictions unless you are positive.

All other solutions are flawed. Asking public to test themselves leads to fraud and lateral flow tests not reliable. PCR late test takes too long and is too expensive and leads to rise of vested interests and fraud. Vaccination passports flawed as vaccination reduces transmission and seriousness of disease but does not STOP transmission to others.

Enter Paraytec. Small, fast and accurate portable test unit at every point of interest. 'Opening up' only increases our chances because fast accurate testing allows opening up.

‘Smythe’

https://twitter.com/carlsmythe/status/1436099601761816578?s=21

It’s close……. Probably

Vast majority of listed companies have share schemes for staff. Nothing to see here.

FYI

https://twitter.com/carlsmythe/status/1435388645939236867?s=20

Discussion about the Paraytec test. Carl sounds very bullish.

Theres going to be a lot of noise de ramping this until we get to the next good RNS. I can ignore it.

Regarding TB selling or not. I read the last RNS and watched TB's interview. In my mind it's clear fraud if he sells any significant amount ahead of verifying the success or otherwise of the strategy to the market. It's not just about what the regulations say about when a director can and can't sell.

So if the CEO says 'I'm going to raise cash to fund development of this product to achieve x and y' the period of interest for director share dealing is open until the work is done. Otherwise he can be shown to have manipulated the SP for financial gain. and to have gained an advantage over other shareholders.

I expect others might disagree but I would think TB knows he's locked in for now.

TLWilliams 'It would appear that, in the eyes of our Government, therapies to complement the vaccination programme, and reduce the burden on the National Healthcare system are not a priority'.

Apologies for quoting directly but this is an interesting thread and I thought it would be worth postponing an alternative view.

The reason vaccines are currently at the forefront is down to currently not being any approved therapeutics. In my view this will change as soon a therapeutics come out of trials - if they are successful it immediately becomes medically and politically imperative to shout about it. In my view if the SNG P3 trial is a success it will be headline news and the government will be very very happy to promote it as a British therapeutic covid drug that works and saves lives.

I think we have to accept that SNG has really only trialled with a small population previously and whilst we are close to it every day as investors the rest of the world is not. We have bias. As always, we wait patiently. GLA.

Seeing as my response earlier got a bit of a reaction (I didn’t expect it to) I would tend to agree that if someone can accept the risk of going all in it is up to them to make that decision but if someone asks the question on a message board as above then they almost certainly are not in that category and may be seeking reassurance to do something that could have a massive negative impact on them. So I would always suggest caution.

This is not advice, DYOR, good luck etc.

We were having a laugh about this on another board a months back. However, it does make you wonder how well LSE manages its data security if someone can easily access it to publish it in this way…….

All I can suggest is that regardless of how much research you have done and how confident you are you should never go ‘all in’ on an AIM stock or any other investment.

It isn’t over. Several RNS in pipeline. They won’t just issue one.

E.g:
Longitudinal study of covid test.
Update on Alzheimer’s test.
Potentially sepsis test
Manufacture of covid test and CE mark.
Sale of Paraytec IP or whole of Paraytec.

I expect we will get another push towards 45p this afternoon.

….. and that’s about as close to a ramp as you will ever get from me!

Well we could get a holding RNS at any time but look at the volume over the last week. Could be you or me. Everyone has a sell point surely even if it’s just to take a bit of profit. Could easily be just PI’s.

Obvs some profit taking at this point. To be expected.

I suspect this RNS was coming as an update on general progress even without the SP rise from yesterday. Bit about noting increase in SP added as this became necessary context. Could be a very good day!

Thanks Kiwi. You are right as usual.

Prof. Regardless. Your analogy is an ignorant one and you have lost the argument on this board now to such an extent that you might as well stick 2 straws up your nose and say ‘wobble’. Although of course you should know that this would be far more dangerous to getting vaccinated.

Paulo. Thanks for fighting the good fight.

I’m certain my South African friends would be amused to hear professorSPDs explanation for describing limiting access in certain circumstances to those who choose not to get vaccinated to apartheid.

I suppose it’s supposed to make us feel bad. What it does is make professor SPD sound like someone we shouldn’t give any credit to.