Member Info for Skelly85

CEZ bought 51% of Cinovec from EMH for 29M Euro.

49% of Cinovec is EMH's only asset.

EMH Market Cap is 34M Euro. Price seems fair no?

One would need to assume I worked a regular 9-5 job and was in the UK to pay attention to a statement like that.

If only NotsoWssieOwl put as much thought into EMH's CEO's words and actions as mine, he wouldn't need to ramp so much. Then individuals like myself wouldn't be here posting truths we know about the company.....

Hi Niknak,

I would have to listen through a load of KC's videos again to get the exact names of who and when which I'm not really too interested in right now. Maybe fingers could tell you, it's imbedded in my head that he would be telling us every xmas that it'd be there as a present.

But if my memory serves me right. we were initially told EMH were doing the DFS. Maybe it was during one of the PFS interviews?

Then I think there was a guy hired directly through EMH who shortly afterwards appointed an outsourced company to oversee it. That went on for maybe another year or two. Here's Keith mentioning in Nov 21 mentioning the DFS that they were doing at the time, saying it would be complete in 2022. 5 Mins into the video. Kieths words, not mine. If people try to bash me I'm going to be able to find more of these videos.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHBILzkjym0

Finally this latest company were appointed to do it.

I'll act however I want. but thanks for the input sharealot. It's means a lot to me

I'm not a bot and I'm not a deramper.

I've been positive about this resource for a longer time than negative.

Positive about the possibility, negative about the reality of how its gone nowhere.

Mick, I was for a long time. Got frustrated with the BS before Xmas, saw through it and bailed. Now just hoping someone in charge puts their drink down and starts doing their job so I can jump back in and make some money off this.

But given how long I was invested I have become frustrated with seeing so many lies pour out the mouth of the person who's voice is supposed to inform investors whether to invest. Hence my motivation to keep talking over those with all their speculative BS.

I honestly don't know about all the AIM CEOs to be honest. It's not a platform I deal with often.

I know it certainly applies here though and hopefully I can share my experience with it for others to make informed judgements.

It just baffles me the CEO hasn't the intelligence to see it's his lies holding the company down regardless of the fundamentals of the resource.

The truth is he can't get an offtake without showing he's going to mine.

He can't mine without finance.

He can't get finance without a DFS.

He has failed 3 attempts to create a DFS and has failed to deliver this specific DFS on two separate timelines.

When I have a few minutes of my day to spare infront of my laptop, I'll come on here and remind everyone that the CEO of this company is untrustworthy until he's either gone, or he delivers something that gets the ball rolling and gives people a reason to believe he can deliver this project.

Even if your were right about what he said in his latest video, you haven't answered what I asked. I asked WHY HE CHANGED hiss story. The meaning of the post is for those here to question why he kept saying g the same thing over and over again, not delivery what he said, then changing his story without acknowledging that he'd changed his story or giving any reasons for not delivering his repeated statements.

The reason for asking is to question if this new statement is anymore truthful than his previous statements given that nothing has been completed.

Does anyone know why the CEO would rant on about offtakes being imminent for years and say they are about to be inked for years. Then in his last 2 public speaking say he wasn't going to make an offtake agreement until the EU financed construction of a mine that as of yet doesn't have a DFS to know if it's even possible?

Which one is the lie? Or are both lies?

Does anyone know why the CEO would rant on about offtakes being imminent for years and say they are about to be inked for years. Then in his last 2 public speaking say he wasn't going to make an offtake agreement until the EU financed construction of a mine that as of yet doesn't have a DFS to know if it's even possible?

Does anyone know why the CEO would rant on about offtakes being imminent for years and say they are about to be inked for years. Then in his last 2 public speaking say he wasn't going to make an offtake agreement until the EU financed construction of a mine that as of yet doesn't have a DFS to know if it's even possible?

I thinknot would be viable if it had a leadership that finished what it started

Wise/fingers/robinhood sitting at home on the couch watching this on repeat all day.

https://youtu.be/9EcjWd-O4jI?si=-9vI29LRt3f_5i4A

The drop in price late December was actually a result of the CEO once again not delivering the DFS he repeatedly said would be delivered. Check all his 2023 interviews for evidence.

It's lovely that all these gigafactories are being built in Europe. So far the CEO has repeatedly said he is discussing potential offtakes with those who require lithium. Repeatedly non of them have resulted in anything.

He even mentioned he isn't even going to sign an offtake until he has every other box ticked, which don't appear to be happening any time soon.

Not likely to be any upward price movement until some RNS shows progress here.

There have been numerous spikes based on speculation here. Those days are over.

EMH down 9% today.

Still no news in the DFS.

Nothing has changed.

Great Post wiseowl.

I observed you complained about my character and how I don't post facts.

I posted a few more facts in reply and ignored your personal attack.

You replied again with more attacks on my character and ignored the facts.

Good job!

Here's a link to the only sourcee of facts you need. It's a list of all Kieths interviews. Watch them. Take notes of timelines he gives, suggestions of imminent things etc. Write down the dates of the interviews and those timelines Head over to LSE and the RNS page for EMH. Scroll through all the rns and look for the rns after those interviews You won't see anything related to those promised tinelines and suggested 'inking.

Take note of the frequency of how many times that happened. Take note of the period over which that happened. Ask yourself some serious questions. DYOR and stop reading links from drivel media sources.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?sca_esv=5bdfde399b30e227&sca_upv=1&sxsrf=ACQVn08LBDQjKlf4FjF5TYcXZ19yCICuWw:1712290316761&q=european+metals+holdings&tbm=vid&source=lnms&prmd=nivbz&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi2-9LAmqqFAxWCevEDHcblBVcQ0pQJegQICxAB&biw=384&bih=729&dpr=2.81#ip=1

That's hilarious fingers/wise/robinhood.

You call me an idiot directly after saying EMH would be $1 minimum if not for AIM market makers. Funniest combo I've heard all day.