Member Info for Skelly85

I love how this thread is titled 49 million grant, when EMH haven't recieved a 49 million grant.

I guess you should ask that question to every person associated with written or televised financial market reporting. Sharealot. That's a lot of sad lads

And also just pointing out the BS ramping from wise/fingers/reversal/robinhood. Why would anyone car about a 50cent buy on asx when the days volume was a quarter of average?

Not sure what makes anything obvious about missing out on something that hasn't happened. Since the frequency of pointing out the obvious flaws with EMH hasn't changed.....

Fingersxd, if it wasn't for these supposed derampers. The new people here wouldn't have the long term context to know that you, wiseowl, wiseinvestor, robinhood and reversal are all the same person.

Theu would also not be aware of how they shouldn't invest here expecting a quick rise to their investment based on progress, because all the progress and promises are never achieved.

That's a completely different statement Colin and you are telling everyone here you think they are idiots if they can't see right through that.

CEZ do not own EMH. Its not rocket science.

Yahoo did not over look 'EMH is 51% owned by CEZ' because CEZ own zero percent of EMH. CEZ own 51% of Geomet and EMH own 49% of Geomet.

Thats lovely, but the actual price is still 20p and that's all people are willing to pay in the real world. We all know why......

Sharealot, I was hoping you would filter me as you previously said you would so I wouldn’t have to worry about you attempting to bully and intimidate me for speaking the truth.

I'm also surprised your posting on a weekend. I thought that's one of the reasons you said I had no life?

"All of this is great timing for EMH while likely to receive a €49million grant from the Just Transition fund in May/Q2. It's more than there whole mcap currently"

There is literally zero evidence from any source for this. Total BS.

The DFS isn't being finalised. It's being re-written because the entire concept of extraction, transportation and processing has been rejected by the local community and has been moved further from the mine. Hence the already 6 month delay on the original 8 month timeline of early Q4 2023.

You're writing completely misleading information to trick potential investors.

Also, didn't you know its not allowed to post on weekends? That's what I was told....

That's completely irrelevant to how EMH is managed and I couldn't care less what you think about the timing of my posts. I couldn't care less about people's attempts to hurt my feelings either.

Would you like to debate EMH, or how irrelevant tech trading is with shares like this? More than happy to listen to what you have to say on these matters......

Facts about how dumb it would be to base your trading of small cap, low volume AIM companies using technical indicators?

Technical indicators used on a small cap like this with no trading volume? Are you having a laugh?

It's because the information was only shared with us because someone else had leaked it to the press and it was in a news article. Otherwise we wouldn't have been told at all.

You're mixing up the words "news rich" with "newsless" and "finalising" with "starting"

The market has shown that the RNS has valued EMH 8% less than yesterday.

Well before you filter me, the only advice I can give you is to never watch a video or read the words on EMHs leadership. Because me words are just a regurgitation of theirs.

Love it. Filtered for pointing out coal plants are not positive for ESG credentials

Yea a coal power plant is just amazing for ESG figures

How is it good that the local population rejected your process plant construction and won?