Member Info for Si_Derman

Haven't had a look , tbh, OT.
Kinda went off on a tangent looking at other stuff due to your link.
But, and to put a less flipant reply, I guess there are many links in a supply chain and you don't necessarily have to be at the top off that chain. Things filter down and work could come from anyone involved.

Thanks for that link,OT. More for one of the other links on the side that is right up my street. ;)
But noted the paragraph, "More than 30 Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) are now in place across the supply chain in support of the bids and the early action needed." Think JW would be RNSing if we were in with a shout, imo.
We know how much he likes his MoU's and LoI's. lol

ETA 16th Nov according to vessel finder

.. at last. The Entsha is actually on it's way.

Now, pay attention, 03.
;)

Or maybe I'm confusing him with the Miami guy as he was something to do with cruise ships, if I recall.
Looks like he's only been in the job for 3 months, from the link I got to work.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/joe-cartoski-6a587b115

Can't see the link, OT. But is that our man in Miami?

Yes, an interesting point Albert raised. Thought there had been mention of the constraints on here before. But that may have been to do with MOD contracts.

Excellent find, OT.
Not long then. Just hope our yard was up to scratch back in July.
Don't think they had painted the crane by then, so may go against us. ;)

If in respect of the subject matter of this thread then not in the running, newbuilds not their thing, from a very quick scan of the website. More conversions and repairs specialists from what I can see. But, TBH, never heard of them before. But then I'm not usually a serial boat spotter. :)

Yeah, very good. Nice composition. Would look cracking if it was a sunset.

LOL Cheers, OT. Or not as the case may be. 300 days today without any kind of alcoholic beverage. :(
The nickname was given to me some 20 years ago when I then had a penchant for apple based refreshment.
More of a Guniness man when I do drink. This dry January thing has gone on a bit too long. :)

It's not three of the Scillonian IV's. It's also a new cargo vessel and an inter-island launch. Maybe they are cheaper. ???

Evening Stokey. Regardless of it's current position it doesn't stop the guys down at the yard getting on with the work on the upgrade though. It may be just waiting there until they are ready with the new mezzanine deck and crane. ???

Lets hope so, re: the Scillonian IV.

Do you know the timeline as regards the contract/tender, whatever, for the NFS by any chance?

Evening all. Nice to see it finish over 27p. :)
Good sleuthing Stokey and you OT.
I've always been encouraged that our team Resolute partner, BMT, have been working on the plans for new Scillonian IV and that of Appledore's history of making the excisting Scillonian III.
The aim is to have the new vessel built and in service by 2024. So, could they manage both? It is feasible to have parts/blocks or even the hull , built elsewhere, and transported for final assembly.
I wonder how long before they decide who gets the contract?

Meanwhile, the Entsha is still stuck up that creek in the Ivory Coast. Unless someone ditched the transponder/ GPS doobry overboard and it's not. :)

Having another go at breaking through that 27p barrier which has show some resistance of late.
https://invst.ly/wfelh
RSI is in a better place too.
Come on, puuuush. :)

Maybe Elrico could put it to him as a suggestion, being as they are besties.
Just messin' Elrico. ;)

Okey dokey, Ryan.That would be interesting to find out. But at the time they were proposing to IPO Renal AI as a spin out from the parent company. Don't know tbqh, but Cf kept using them as an example as a way to do a spin-out and people at the time mentioned the timings of the RNS and ex-date. So it became a thing, I guess, Still think it's a good idea.

Toddler, I can't tell youwhat he does. But what I can tell you is he has a very particular set of skills, skills he has acquired over a very long career. Skills that make him a nightmare for people like you. :)

He didn't just mention it Ryan it was almost a mantra and the company was given as an example in pretty much every presentation.
Okay, so I've done the leg work for you. I didn't know the exact details and wasn't sure if I was wrong.
And I'm never wrong. I thought I was once, but it turned out I was just mistaken.
Anyhoo, the company was EKF and the spinout was Renalytix AI.
Here is one example where it was mentioned
The Investor Meet Company Presentation, 2nd Jun 2021 from 15.50 mins
I tried using my link but it had my details on, but I'm sure you can find it.

And here is the part in the RNS from EKF, "The Restricted Offer is only available to Qualifying EKF shareholders, being persons who were recorded in the register of members of EKF at 8 p.m. on 10 October 2018 (the "Record Date") "

And the date of that RNS was........ drum roll please.........the 11th of October.
https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/EKF/launch-of-restricted-offer-by-renalytix-ai-plc-delteki5g71zbqc.html

And you're most welcome, BTW. ;)

"the record date can only be put into the future"
No it can't.
The whole premise of the spin-out was based on another company doing a similar thing. Can't be bothered to look and see which one it ws ATM. But CF mentioned it time and time again in most interviews at the time. It was that company that announced a cut off date that was before the actual announcement of their spin-out. I think people saw our spin-out going the same way and maybe, I guess, bought more/stayed in, etc to capitalise. It was only when it was telegraphed to be happening in the future that he gave people to chance to sell out or buy in/back in, later. That was the lesson that I hoped he had learnt from the POLB spin out and next time do it the way it kept saying the other company had. As it stands nobody knows what is going to happen so may be selling to retain profit, having a dabble elsewhere, holding back on loading up.........
If he wants stability then come out and say that the ex date will be at a time before the RNS and that way it benefits only those that hold at that time. And if nobody knows when that day will actually come you can be sure that they would be buying in and holding right now. From what I have read here since POLB it would seem that the consensous of this board to be in favour of the back dated cut off. Nothing would serve LTH's better IMO.
Just do it CF.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBSxAAJ_2SI