RE: Fertecon6 Dec 2018 10:02
ChrisFrance, why would you expect us to debate the same old same old that was debated and relevant to a report purely requisitioned for planning purposes back in 2013/14?. some of us are very well aware of your thoughts on this matter and it's been openly debated in great detail previously, it has relivence now as it did back then, no one is denying it, it does not change the actual situation today four years on other than planning was passed the mine is being built and the Company crack on at a pace with Marketing, Crop Trials, Foward sales agreements and St2 financing, stop being so pretentious about debate, those who have already debated this in great detail have moved on, you clearly haven't so stop trying to justify your agenda by suggesting it's just defensive or insulting responses, when clearly people are getting bored with your stuck record act.
Sheps8.