Member Info for SharketMare

Add, his targeting of you - one of the most level headed posters on here - has been farcical. Like I said, the moderators here are no longer interested. I've emailed them several times to get rid of the blatant trolls but they don't care. Probably not helped by the fact I've asked them when they're going to sort out the countless issues with the website.

Tesla, I am far from a ramper of this stock and welcome any of the 20 you reference to find evidence of me lying on this board. I'll wait.

This board has not been moderated for some time now, which is why certain posters are able to spend the best part of 8 hours each day posting abuse at anyone who has a remotely positive view of the company and its prospects.

It's also not gone unnoticed that the moderators have decided to give up on banning the resident mollusc. This is fine by me as I think he adds some good value RE discussion of Solgold, but he was also responsible for trashing the website on several occasions.

It feels like the folks at LSE, who have done a fair job themselves at ruining this once good website, have basically said you lot on the Solgold can get what you're given.

I found it very odd that when I first switched on my computer at 7.15, needalife calling me out as a liar (I have never lied on this board - why on earth would I?) had 3 upticks. 12 minutes later that had leapt up to 19.

I've never had more than 10 grand invested in this stock and have spent far, far too long discussing it on here. It's a real shame that over the last few months that has become nigh on impossible due to incessant ramblings of some halfwit from down under, and petty squabbles between other posters.

Atb

Rattled :)

Needalife has been here 7 months and has posted nearly 1,400 times, and only on this BB. The guy is a f*cking lunatic. Be worried that people like him walk among us.

I've been posting on this board for 9 years and in total have posted just shy of 1,750 times (across a fair few shares).

n

I'm sure we can all agree that watching needalife writhe about like a little worm off the back of an objectively positive RNS has been great.

Fort, Scott is CEO of the company and his name is on the RNS. It wouldn't be published without his say so and certainly not with his name on it. You are talking b*llocks yet again.

Fort that is utter dross and shame on the 3 people who upvoted it too. Mather is supportive of Caldwell. You continue to ignore this fact.

Playbook*

Add if that was the intention you'd think he'd put his name to the RNS. Mather as NED lending his voice to this news is bizarre and makes me think that this work happened a while ago but only tested in labs recently (latter half of 2023, according to the RNS). You can see the high mineralisation with your eyes.

This might be a final roll of the dice for Nick to get the payout he and DGR have wanted for so long. It's either desperate stuff or part of a playback that's finally come off the shelf. We shall see.

Is this all part of the lowball defence we have discussed at length over the years? Solgold 'recently' drilled these holes. When?

And once again we hear from our NED Nick Mather. Where is Caldwell? I find this baffling and highly unusual.

Anyway exciting results. Let's see what the market makes of them.

You'll be corrected on your calcs when GGP publish their revised MRE which should indicate a 50% uplift in resource. They're also fully funded to production, which should be sometime next year. As stated previously, comparisons between the two companies are ludicrous.

More garbage from the self-proclaimed "performance alchemist".

1. Who does 'they' refer to when referencing the autobots? Who is benefitting from the situation? It's been documented multiple times on here that only a small handful of these A trades are algorithms.

2. There are not 20 people in the data room considering bidding for SOLG. Of those who have signed agreements, I think 5-6 arranged site visits (from memory). With a couple arranging second visits.

3. The company has stated that it will look to raise finance before June of next year. Likely April IMO if we haven't managed a sale. The 18 months point is nonsense.

Exhausting isn't it 1984. That and the constant commodity price updates.

Anyway, we've finished the day slightly up. I don't really understand why we published the Porvenir RNS, with no next steps, but at least we're communicating something to the market. Get the IPA over the line before the AGM and get the business sold. Still firmly believe that Jiangxi want this asset packaged and ready to go before making a move. We can't be that far off.

On the button, rcgl2. I also think TheItalian is probably right, and that this AGM will pass without event. There haven't been any distress signals from the company as far as I can tell.

But 11 (b) refers to the sale of shares held in treasury, which by definition are already in issue? Sorry if I'm being dim.

Yes, let's put an ESG consultant in charge of a mining company. What are you smoking Fort?

Cheers add. Not sure I get why but I will trust your judgement!

Just reading through the specials. Does 11 (b) refer to the 157m(?) shares we hold? Do we need the special to pass to be able to sell these?