Member Info for shamI89

Dont get caught folks, read the Rns maximum you can get is 0.2 per share and you have got to be stupid to pay 0.26.There is 50% chance that it can go zero.So dont get caught, Neil is nursing heavy losses and is restless as a trapped mouse to get out but dont let him

Amigo is heading for absolute zero and company has said it.So I dont care about what in-between.But looks like this is heading to Zero as well.Are these £2,3,4 buys yours?

Spot on, Neil knows that as well.But hayho he will try to spread bs to cause a "p&d" I for once want him to put some more money in and then for this share to go zero.

Lol, then why not keep quiet if you are that confident share will take care. As I said I am following you now. Looks like you are already sitting on 70% loss here as you were ramping it way higher. It is crystal clear that there is no value left apart from 0.2 per share and there is equal chance of this getting to 0.So why pay 0.27 when maximum you can get is 0.2.Clearly there is a false market and trading should be suspended until we now the outcome to save private investors

Secondly if there was a value attached we would have got it covered in RNS today.I am sure there are already quite a few cash shells on aim, what makes you think someone looking to do an RTO would choose this particular company?Secondly cash shell needs to be voted through and would definitely lead to zero value for shareholders if no company decides to rto into until September and that may not be an acceptable outcome for shareholders. As I said all sort of fancy stories are being spread to lure private investors into another "p&d".Liquidity would start drying from tomorrow, company gave multiple warnings but these were same people were shouting "takeover at premium" and rest is history.

It is my third time answering this, this empty shell is worth nothing to anyone as rules have changed and anyone willing to do rto would need to raise or show certain amount of cash.Back in old days RTO was a cheaper way of entering the market and would safe related company time and money.If there was a value in being an empty shell we would have found out.Currently shareholders either get 0 or 0.2 and there is nothing more nothing less to that.

Do your own research never ever trust anyone as you have scumbags like Neil777 who will say anything to make a few quids. Aim was not an easy place to make money on, but now a days you have dodgy management, p&d merchants on twitter and bsh**ters who are there to fleece new entrants.Neil fully knows that in best case case scenario shareholders would only get 0.2 and there is equal chance that shareholders would get nothing.But given scumbag he is he will say anything to lure private investors in so that he can trade hus way out of it at other people's misery.

Not really doing an RTO made sense couple of years ago to save the costs.I know quite a few companies did it.But rules have changed now as companies need to have certain amount of cash before they can RTO and that is why we dont get them anymore.

As I said it is all about "greater fool theory" having said sewage rat like Neil would try anything to lure naive investors into buying this share.But needless to say karma has caught up with him. If anyone wants to take a gamble he should take it at 0.10

Anyhow I had a very profitable trade last month and put that money into mtl.Can you please deramp it for me so that I can increase my holding

Hahaha you have been shafted royally, you were buying at 0.75 and even higher.But lets see as it looks you will be left with nothing this time.Good luck you will need it as looks like you have been stung by quite a few suicidal shares.

Empty shells have no value these days at all and think rules have changed as any company thinking of RTO needs to inject 5 or 9 millions .Which is pointless as you might as well get your own listing.Secondly domain and brand did have some value and that has gone as well.

You are thicker than I though, why would it rise 500% when in best case scenario shareholders can get 0.20 per share and there is 50% chance that they wont get this at all.

Lol I had a bag there but got out as did not like the idea of investing in suspended share.Go through posts may be you would find me warning investors of very same outcome too.

If it countinues trading until september than it will run out of cash and in that case shareholders wont get nothing.That leaves us with two options and in one option shareholders would get 0.2 per share and in other they wont get anything.So why pay 0.27 or 0.3 when maximum you can get is 0.2 and you can lose it all as well?

Lol, "stuck" ..... There were smart investors like you in "revb" who thought it is better idea to get in just before that suspension and I warned them that it may longer but hay hoo.Having said that what a shameless person you are company has clearly stated that maximum it can pay to shareholders is 0.2 per share and there is a good chance that shareholders may not get anything at all and here you are trying to lure in a rew others...

This after 7th March Rns has only himself/herself to blame and deserves to lose money.

Yes but them net receivables are not even enough to make loan repayments back, administration costs are £800000 per month and needless to say company needs to come up with a plan for bank loan.Where is money going to come from?

I am still baffled that some people are still trying to ramp/pump/dump it. Equity is Toast and now we know why phelam and lombard were selling it.I suspect they have made their money back through shorting and now has a chance to convert loans into shares post placing so win/win for them.I am loving it this share has caught quite a few "twitterati pump and dump merchants" and many of them are nursing heavy losses.

Well so much effort is being put to pump and dump it, reality is that £430000 wont even last them half a month and company needs to raise more money than its market capital.Dont get caught in this "p&d"