Member Info for shallwe

I Googled 'Pro-investor seeing machines' but it's below FYI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7pykkWjm5U

I'm not saying this as a ramper as I like to think my feet are more firmly on the ground, but often I've seen a morning RNS follow lots of late buys, as if MM's know something, which I'm sure they don't ;)
Then you realise, we've already had two this week so there can't be another one surely.

I think that Rory Cellan-Jones' analysis hits the nail on the head: -

'In May 2018, when Elaine Herzberg was killed, confidence in autonomous vehicle technology was at an all-time high.

Everyone from Elon Musk to the British Chancellor Philip Hammond was telling us that robo-taxis and other autonomous vehicles would be on the roads within a couple of years, cutting congestion and delivering a big boost to road safety.

But the accident in Arizona punctured that confidence.

It showed that however smart the machine learning in the autonomous systems, mixing robots with humans as cars made the journey towards full autonomy was going to prove a real challenge.

Not only did Uber have to halt its testing programme for a while, but rivals such as Google's Waymo became notably more cautious in their trials. Only today it is being reported that the Chinese tech giant Baidu is pushing back the full rollout of its robo-taxis until 2025, partly because of confusion about regulations.

As long as "self-driving" cars still need a human safety driver behind the wheel, there will be confusion about whose fault it is when something goes wrong - but going fully autonomous is such a huge leap that even the boldest tech firm is likely to be very cautious about going first.'

Absolutely Wilson. And don't forget SeeingTom's explanations of the stock market too.

All round, easily the best board on LSE.

They've found it :))

I noticed that PM 'Liked' Colin's post too.

Talk about Smart eye, I can't believe that they are either keeping track or even beating SEE over the last couple or so weeks, but they are. They had another +6% rise today. I appreciate that you can't compare like for like, but still bl00 dy annoying.

Zequic. I've said it before hear, a good contrary opinion is great, but only if it is based on facts and research. However our green blob chums post neither, they post their own opinions only, based on ****E.

I've certainly never heard of a company delaying results due to (dare I say the word ' imminent') large deals. I'm with MrBB with this, administrative due to Covid, rather than anything else.

I would love to be able to read the SEYE tweets, but they blocked little 'ol me.

I can't believe that there are still some here that haven't filtered the green blobs. I haven't seen their bull s**t for a few months now.

It's made me a lot richer too for not seeing their comments.

Just got a dummy sell / buy at the same price of 4.25p, although I couldn't 'sell' many.

'Global semiconductor company, 'automotive', 'as we partner with large automotive semiconductor companies'.

Got to be Nvidia, surely? Although PM did drop Texas Instruments into his interview last week.

Too late Him go, you scared it. Dropping now, but I expect it to pick up later again.

Last week's RNS it's a game changer and shows that SEE can go anywhere now.

I wish they'd keep quiet about a takeover bid. I want to see the SP ten-fold before a ten-fold bid comes in :)

Or maybe I'm just being too greedy?

Not only a thank you to the person who signed the Conti and Xilinx deals, but also to the person who refused to sign exclusive deals but insisted on signing non-exclusive deals at no doubt a lower price, but could SEE the future.

The thing to remember is that none of this is illegal, immoral maybe (and even I don't fully agree with that), but not illegal.

50glass - the person who says we should only post once a month, who has posted 11 times in the last 30 days!
I have a word for that.......

That is one heck of a technical RNS, probably not totally understood by the financial markets too much but to the initiated here, it is superb. I've been critical of SEE in past RNS' as they leave out monetary value from their announcements that is unfortunately the main driver of their SP, however in this case I can't complain.
This RNS confirms all the research here by you guys and especially the patent information being dug up by JC and TLS. This in my mind is one of the most important RNS' to come out of SEE for a long while now, very technical, but confirmatory.
My only complaint is that they describe themselves '.....as an automotive leader in DMS technology.....' Come on SEE, start using the correct terminology, 'the world leader in DMS technology'.

Don't forget Seeing2020, PM said in his last interview that there are a number of RFQ's in play, some of which are with multiple Tier 1's per OEM.
Happy days. Beware of the quiet one