RE: CA's Investment - Average price paid20 Aug 2021 11:43
Flynchy
Whilst the scam was being attempted the paid canary monkeys tactic was to make bald statements with reams of 'proof'. and postulate that unless someone was prepared to spend an hour writing proving them wrong, their view was correct. it was hogwash.
That is what you are doing - stating that unless someone is prepared to prove you wrong via absolute proof, your view is correct.
Stevie D & HullFC have gently indicated that your way of calculating is not the correct way. You ignored those gentle promptings. I know precisely why it is not the correct way and could explain to you. But I am not being paid to educate you.
For weeks even months before the court hearings I stated in absolute terms how things would pan out, including precisely how CA would act, and when. I was not party to any inside info. EVERY statement I made was bang on the money.
I could hazard a fair guess now as to what CA's plan it - and barring fine detail or Acts of God, I would happily bet 75% of the farm my view would be correct - I don't post that view because I would immediately be hit with a chorus of 'prove it'.
You should build into your statements a degree of respect for other posters' track records of getting huge calls 100% correct when all the 'evidence' and 'opinion' seemed completely contrary. And perhaps read Rudyard Kipling's poem 'If'.
My view remains - CA average is circa 7p. And I would happily beat the farm that my view is accurate.
I suggest we agree to differ - always the best way, particularly on non-crucial issues
Sign In
Follow the stocks
