Member Info for semaphorRed

Surely! Imminently!

Ah sorry, don't mind me, I was replying to a post from 2002

Where's this from? How do we see who participated?

He...did say that. There was no direct quote here but he did say he bought only what he could afford.

"Shame they awarded themselves 'easy target' options"

Literally. Should've been 7p.

"So just because JM knows about his emulsion fuels it does not mean his automatically a great CEO. "

Agreed. How much are you willing to increase the wage bill by?

"If this does not happen in August JM needs to be removed from the CEO position."

And replaced with whom?

No idea when it'll start but I do believe we'll only be told after it's complete.

I remember all these comments back in 2016. They were true then and they're true now, a great product has never been our problem.

Quite.

Aye MadDogMc, my point exactly. I don't say these people don't exist but I struggle to believe they have much effect on anything. Like me, for example.

There's more than one.

I like them. There's easy to spot and you don't have have to feel guilty not throwing him a quid when he's done acting the fool.

"He has to keep himself totally distant from Haggis"

Although his command of English varies significantly from Haggis - if it were worse, he could be putting it on - but I'd struggle to believe Haggis was strategic enough to be making consistent grammatical errors in order to distance himself from a future duplicate account.

RMS specifically states bed and ISA. What a waste of time discussing this. We can also tack of the piddling number of shares this involves. All the millionaire directors too poor to put £60k into these shares. What cars do they all drive?

"You are not adding value to QED in any way"

I mean that's incontrovertibly true, who on this board is?

"As I understand it:"

Excellent, well explained.

"If the client runs on a campaign/on-demand basis, as we've been advised, then I don't see how there would be any way to resume the trial at any other time than the beginning of the next run."

can anyone explain what this means? (amateur)

"It is very bizarre you log in under various names.You must have some agenda"

I do that too. Or, at least with other sites. I try keep it a little random. I have an agenda. I want...need....Quadrise to succeed asap. I don't believe I've contributed to this ever, but my nerves are a little strung out by this investment.

"If the BOD concentrate mainly on getting current commercial projects live and slow down R&D. With approx. £3,000,000 in the bank and a burn rate £240,000 (which I think includes some current R&D) this should last at least 12 months at a burn of £200,000 PM 15 months at a stretch.

If Valkor happens it’s helps immensely funds jump to £4,494,500 at a burn £240,000 gives the BOD 18 months of funding ie to the end of 2024 enough time to get MSC sorted."

An excellent post with useful figures for all. If I ran this I'd pin it.

I'd dump the rest of the board, you just need Jason and the technical people to get this over the line. You can always rehire Chairman types later. The salaries are killing us.

""This 30% drop I'm sure will be history once the money is in the bank, and the share price goes up again as we are fully funded and approaching the Morocco trial."

This part may well be true though my crystal chart ball was lost at the beach so I can't tell you when.