Member Info for semaphorRed

No. It's been signed. However there are further agreements with the same parties to come.

Are the rights to the tech for sale?

The reality is, we want or should want, Quadrise to do well as a business. If the share price doesn't react immediately it should be irrelevant unless we want to sell now. The share price must and will react at the point of commercialisation and we are making excellent progress to that point now. Whether the share price is 2.5p or 4p doesn't matter at all.

A Public Display of Affection? I love you all too!

Maersk should be made to pay a coward tax on bioMSAR

Https://www.rivieramm.com/news-content-hub/news-content-hub/stakeholders-gear-up-for-bunker-fuel-vessel-trial-79562

"I believe we're in for another 6-8 weeks of radio silence accompanied by an initially steady then slightly falling SP. Back to around 2p when next RNS arrives???"

Ok?

"Raising finance in that way is pie in the sky and never going to happen"

I think I agree, broadly. However, working with an investment bank on funding could result in a hybrid loan or convertible and the tax-loss value of the company is something it could be secured on. Of course, ever actually having recourse to it is indeed pie in the sky and theoretical - something only for the balance sheet of the investment bank.

Carry forward corporate losses create company breakup value/sale value on which banks may lend.

Out of interest why can't we take a loan secured on our tax losses to date?

15% is neither here nor there for Quadrise.

Look, the British/Euro market are the worse side of anemic and would struggle to raise money from a council estate lottery winner as Bill Ackman who's NAV is hugely about the price because no one among the pot heads of Amsterdam has heard of him. Plus, end of last year prophet Sunal tried to launch a British ISA with an additional 5k for British shares which is yet another typically limp wristed approach. If you want a high share price, you either get deals (not almost deals) or you get the yanks involved

"if JM and the Board had been honest with us about time scales"

They were. If you believe the board are committing multi-year securities fraud, investing in such a company would be insane.

Https://en.portnews.ru/news/359340/

You can also use tinyurl (Google it) to make it work

"Maybe more news coming to strengthen the sp"

If only it wasn't a jailable offence to do this.

Https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/1040270/quadrise-rockets-on-fuel-trial-deal-with-cargill-and-mac-1040270.html

http://tinyurl.com/mrwpcn25

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/1040290/quadrise-s-ship-fuel-collaboration-brings-in-quality-partners-say-brokers-1040290.html

https://www.proactiveinvestors.com/companies/news/1040334/five-at-five-bp-payouts-natwest-share-sale-ftse-100-jumps-quadrise-deal-and-meta-s-ai-clampdown-1040334.html

I reckon the SP will be a bit higher in the next week or so. There should be stuff in the news and perhaps some investment recommendations too

Ahhh. Resting at a 33% increase on the day, with dry ink from the largest privately owned commodity trader on the planet to supply our fuel to the world's largest shipping company who purchased a specific ship for our fuel. Certainly the company is worth far more than it ever has been in the past yet we sit at 2.5p rather than the indicative 25p. Although, this has been determined, our price will be far lower than it should be until money lands in our bank account, from whichever source. Best of luck and fortune, all.

And in more moderate news, we are precisely where we were, precisely 5 years ago to the day. The share price that is. To my mind we are far, far ahead now, but the market is not a logical place.