Member Info for semaphorRed

Also saying MSC need help fueling a single ship for a few months is literally mental

"claiming it will reduce CO2 emissions by 25,000 tons"

One panamax emits an average of 40,000tons per year. People need to stop being taken in by joke greenwashing PR stunts.

Yes...even if those shares were simply awarded to them for some milestone or other, skin in the game is skin in the game.

Go on piggy, give us a date and a price prediction.

You are saying that you didn't buy shares at a particular time, that you did buy shares at a particular time, and under what conditions you would buy shares in future. I'm sorry but I see a distinction without a difference here. You're literally talking about your buys or lack thereof.

"I didn't in the last funding either I bought on open market I think at the time I made clear that where others may feel they need to support the business I didn't want to over pay for the shares ."

"This is why people shouldn't talk about their buys and sells"

You're literally doing this.

"you’re vouching for him as a long term holder?"

You're right. I don't know he's a long term holder for sure. Not a single person here can confirm anyone holds any shares at all, nor has bought or sold any shares. Oh, and I am a french bird using Google translate and I find your dismissal of my identity offensive and potentially illegal.

"So why tell everyone about your overexposure and concerns? You think shareholders don’t know the situation. You’re a Bullsh*tter 46G, and as you said yourself, you’re a trader and I doubt very much you hold any stock right now."

Ridiculous post. He spoke of his concerns because he has them. Even I know he's a long term holder and what difference if he trims his exposure from eg 13M shares to 12M? He would still be more long than someone who maintained a steady 6M share holding.

The fact that ports don't have shore power or when ships don't use it is genuinely awful. It turns my stomach to see a cruise ship at port in the middle of a city belching out rubbish into the air for twenty hours straight

Which gives them more market power not less.

"They only tell you when they're buying and selling when they think it will benefit them."

But it will never benefit them because this is a silly forum about a stock with silly little volumes. And I hate the moniker "traders" as if they're not sitting in the back of Starbucks for the free wifi.

"further opportunities for shareholders to engage with the company"

Which shareholders, I think is the question, and how were they chosen?

Who can reply?

Accounts @QuadrisePLC mentioned can reply.

They know the score.

I will say: I don't actually know whether to be disappointed or happy with the progress we've made thus far and in the time we've made it. Certainly it all seems very positive but I don't think I really understand the whole process and the additional contracts required to be sure of where exactly we are.

These back and forth discussions, out in the open, can only be a good thing. Read or don't. Reply or don't. Go for a walk, or don't.

Essentially Goodfuels are a double-sided CD innovated from a single sided CD. We're Spotify.

"Glomar have 21 vessels and MSC have over 800"

And Cargill have 600

Without dates (because we don't like those) what are the next steps for us with MSC (and co), Morocco, and Utah? I understand there's one or more contracts to be signed with MSC?

Responding to morons is often helpful because the response isn't for them, it's for everyone else.

I tried to do this in Valencia to get a photo and ended up getting incredibly lost and was escorted out of a secure area by Guardia Civil. Not my proudest moment.