Member Info for sellonnews

One has to wonder if "having an opinion" equates to abject panic on the realisation of selling prematurely.
.
.

Unless EQT have been working through the night it is unlikely that the consequences of the Ebioss/BTC deal will be announced before 8am. It is anticipated that any funding/board changes are awaiting confirmation, which in my opinion gives some exceptional leeway to take a position on EQT.

Market makers will no doubt use this hiatus to raise and lower the price at will.
.
.
GL
.

AIMOracle

Having read through the full release, does it appear that BTC have loaned Ebioss Euro4,000,000 with an option to convert into Ebioss stock at a 20% discount to the price 10days prior to the conversion?

I believe that if so, this adaptation to the original offer is due to the recent share price of Ebioss while still allowing BTC to take 49.9% of Ebioss in the future.

Would BTC have made the loan to Ebioss if some of it hadn't been destined to place EQT on a sound financial footing, thereby converting MOUs into firm orders?

As further news becomes available, it should be positive for the share price of both Ebioss and EQT imho.
.
.
GL
.

If Steeldrum contribute during Q3 I got it wrong, if not... either way, I'm happy with my decision.

Scarface72,

ANGS is interesting but it didn't appear to give the potential upside of ZEN which I thought was worth a punt under 4p - impossible to buy in any quantity last week. I will buy back into CERP at some point as I have great respect for Mr Koot's pedigree but perhaps I'm a tad more impatient than he is - fantastic foundations being built imo.
.
.
GL
.

Before 1 January 2000 gold sales in the UK were subject to VAT. This changed because of the disparity between rules in the European Union. For example, some countries in the EU didn’t charge VAT on gold at all or charged it at a very low rate. This meant that the UK was at a disadvantage compared with other EU member states. The introduction of the exemption meant that for VAT purposes, gold would be treated the same as other investments, such as stocks and shares.

https://www.royalmint.com/invest/bullion/discover-bullion/tax-on-bullion-explained/
.
.

Montecristo

From the information available, I do not now see any marked increase in production before Q4, and only then if the deals have closed. SWP will not commence before Q1 2019. As such, one could be buying @ 5p in October/November rather than 7p.

Instead of "rainbow chasing", it was a pragmatic decision to lock in 83% profit and invest elsewhere in stocks which appear to have a better upside potential over the next three-to-six months. Only time will tell if the analysis and decision was correct.

For comparative analysis, the majority was placed fairly equally between EQT, NCCL, and STAR. Let's revisit in September and see if CERP outperformed any of these.
.
.
GL
.

Yes, really!

I was not prepared to see the gains dwindle further while waiting for the Q3 update: Sell out, reinvest elsewhere. return October/November when there should be more upside, even if that means paying 7p.

I may buy back before then depending on the other investments so just keep a look out for buys of 250,000 or multiples thereof in the future.

If you believe that there are better opportunities with other shares, it would indeed be a pure nonsense not to sell a stagnant/falling share to maximise any gains elsewhere.
.
.
GL
.

https://spire.io/products/healthtag

Click on "Order Now" for prices - US$200 currently most popular (for 8)
.
.

During the last few days I have been divesting my CERP holdings (several millions) and the 1,000,000 today cleared them all. with an average 83% profit. At one point that was over 129% and the slow drop downwards, along with the recent news made my mind up.

The future potential is superb but I didn't see any marked upside from here until October/November at which point I'll be buying back in, even if that's at 7p for the potential SWP production.

GL to all.
.
.

riddler

Abolutely, but as Q1 is the Company's slowest period, for Q2 to only have revenue in the $1.5 to $2 million range ($3 to $3,5 million H1) would understate the acknowledged growth confimed by STAR, ergo my 3.5 to 4.5 million for the period.

It will be interesting to see if a supercapacitor is incorporated into the design for the "burst of energy" required when sending a warning thereby prolonging battery life.

Perhaps the broker will give an updated projection shortly, incorporating order/production increases?
.
.
GL
.

"Pilot release to occur in July for first 200 customers using iOS devices (Apple iPhone)

Lionsgold will make an announcement when the pilot goes live"
.
.
GL
.
.

Based on Q1 revenue of $1.5 million (50% increase on BoD target) and the fact it was stated that revenue is continuing to grow at Q1 pace, I believe that H1 revenue should be in the $3.5 to $4.5 million range. Any new contracts would obviously increase that target, with a potential full year revenue over $10 million, excluding new contracts and the UN tender.

Any large binding contract/s should enable commercial funding, without the need for a placing imo, nor a convertible loan facility (to be avoided at all costs!)

Looking forward to the next trading statement with positive anticipation.
.
.
GL
.

Thank you for replying, much appreciated.

As an afterthought, once Ebioss and BTC are holding 25% each, I see no reason for them not to increase that to 30% each.
.
.
GL
.

BTC are taking 49% of Ebioss which holds just over 50% of EQT. I believe fthat Ebioss are buying in the market to maintain their holding subsequent to the EQT funding issue. Once this is completed, there should be every reason for the Ebioss/BTC deal to progress rapidly.

On this basis, I expect confirmation of the Ebioss/BTC deal, notification of the directors joining the EQT board, and amount of funding to EQT in a single RNS. With the financial backing of BTC, any MOUs could be readilly converted into actual orders fairly soon thereafter.

Your perspective on the above is more than welcome and keenly awaited.
.
.
GL
.

11.48 @ 1.07p
.
.
GL
.

Look for 1 x 2m buy.
.
.
GL
.

As I stated before they were reported:

"Wait for the 2m buys x 2"

It is humbly suggested that SF's claim is erroneous.

As to changing my name to "buyonnews", I'll pass haha That's not to preclude further top-ups as and when (smiley)
.
.
GL
.

Just topping up
.
.
GL
.

Wait for the 2m buys x 2
.
.
GL
.

Keep an eye out for 2 x 2m buys.
.
.
GL
.