RE: US wind10 Dec 2025 11:31
You are ahead of me...added some more but I have only got my carrying price down to 107.
These grid improvements are all incrementally good news in the long term. The short term nonsense is all driven by the CFD stuff and if one digs below the surface that all seems like noise, whether its Option 1, 2 or the status quo. Most people think of CFDs as subsidies, when in fact they are price stabilising mechanisms that work in both directions - there was actually a long period during the gas price spike when wind generators were actually flowing money back to the Treasury. The long term cost of generation is a known quantum - Onshore wind is cheaper than offshore wind and both are significantly cheaper than new gas generation. Anyone who thinks gas prices are going much below where they are now is dreaming. It is all about cost of capital and the expectation on an orderly market for the generated product.
I would go so far as to think that it is unlikely that new gas output would be built at scale without some form of long term goverment price stabilising mechanism (CFD) in order to make the risk capital affordable.
Ergo, the government has to have credibility in the market place, whoever is in power, in order to provide the correct context for private sector investment. If they pull the rug on existing contracts that credibility will be in the wind forever, if you excuse the pun.
I dont particularly like the ramping that goes on, but I think that we may well look back at this period and view it as an unusual buying opportunity. I wish I had more capacity.
On the other hand, I thought it was a no brainer at 125 and 115.
Ho ho ho as the bloke in red would say.
As always DYOR.