Member Info for Safy

It’s too late in the night to look for my original WHO thread with timelines.

If I recall correctly Mologic ODX was one or two weeks ahead of us, someone managed to figure it out how far ahead Mologic were.

Well Mologic have changed status, and typically within another week or two they’ll get their approval.

So next week or week after latest we could get a status change based on a regular application.

In my case scenario, we should get a status change this week or next week. But if more approvals are in the pipeline these days then perhaps a week extra.

Clark

The date on the doc is today’s buy I think it’s normally updated tomorrow.

Didn’t ODX have DCGI only too? Not ICMR

Bench, let’s be frank here, GDR has yet to over achieve on any major milestone, so going with 3 weeks is with some contingency.

Hype

They reckon 3 weeks in the article, and that must be a max timeframe which came with a nod from GDR. So I’m going with two weeks before something comes out.

AimNaim

Same dunce who wanted to rip peoples heads off and pi55 down their necks when he’s ramp failed.

Same dunce who used to gloat GDR was an easy hold, then when we tanked he lost the plot and threw his toys out the pram.

Anyone taking any advice on gdr from him needs to really think twice.

Definitely a new page.

Once and for all we can put the NHS sales to bed. It’s not our market.

Says the FDA approval was put in June. Now nobody can say they don’t believe they put in for FDA in June.. ahem teabiscuit.

New POC test update

‘First commercial sales July 2020 – sales into Europe
Purchase orders and indicative sales intent of over £1m – subject to regulatory approvals‘

I don’t understand first commercial sales July... huh I thought we’ve not made any sales yet??!??

‘Applied for various other in country approvals – June July August 2020‘

So they are applying for more approvals... in July and August??!? Who could that be for?

‘We believe there is large demand from the UK in terms of affordable point of care testing.’

I’m glad they recognise there is huge demand here... does this mean they also recognize coming late to the party isn’t an option?

Looking good.

1 sell in the last 11 trades

BEGO, SHOC on 103
FCAP 104

PEEL 107

Boom

Guys,

I wasn’t going to say this but honestly filter GloriaMarket. He / she is an absolute dunce, deramper. I’ve wondered before, and called her / him out on Saturday and reading the last few posts I am in no doubt anymore.

Talking about vaccines where we all get one before year end. Even if a vaccine was available, who would want to go first? Even the gov are struggling to get numbers signed up for trials. Talking down tests?? Wtf you’re invested in a covid share. If you don’t believe in tests what are you doing here? Treatments like SNG. SNG is a punt. SNG is not remdesivir. Have you even read up on SNG and what the scientists said at the time when they put out the RNS?

And now bringing the subject about another placing. It’s absolute utter nonsense of another placing. What an absolute ****e for even suggesting it. We’ve not even spent the last 8m, why would we need more money?

Apols if already posted Gloria but you should read this

https://www.medtechdive.com/news/hhs-commits-65m-to-add-thermo-fisher-beckman-coulter-covid-19-test-suppl/583501/

Apologies Gloria, perhaps I was a bit harsh but I’m glad you agree how off the mark your post was.

Was that a deramp Gloria?

The FDA just approved a Yale university tests, which Yale says works on Saliva. Yale reckon it should be priced at $10 per test.

So you think our test which is better would cost $1.60? And the Yale one costs nearly 6 times more? And the Yale test is supposed to be cheap hence described as a breakthrough.

I’m sorry but I’m beginning to think your worthy of the filter button.

There is a covid lab test circa £4 in India, which isn’t as accurate but possibly cheapest test in the world. So our test is 60% cheaper than the cheapest test in the world?

I disagree entirely

6.5m isn’t for tests, it’s the technical solution. Upgrading a lab costs money. And prob costs millions when you’re talking about 100k extra a day.

Me too....

Ok I totally get what you mean. I was going to post about this today under conspiracy theory. I’ll do it tomorrow and hopefully you and others can help figure this out.

Night.

Yes but the GDR RNS says they’ve identified a lab, not 10 labs. That doesn’t mean our numbers are **** from the BC lab as we don’t know how many they’ll be pushing from their 1 lab. Even 10k tests a day is bloody brilliant for starters.

10 sites x 10,000 increase per site = 100,000

So that’s an increase of 100,000 tests per day. At least that’s how I understood it.

10k at 10 sites, the RNS says a lab has been identified. Doesn’t say ten sites :)

But this is where it gets confusing. A single lab can do 10-20-30... if they geared it up right?

Also i will be a tad disappointed if Beckman are doing a small operation themselves. But kitting up labs for bigger operations than their own.

In other words it literally could be anything. 10k or lots more.