RE: one positive21 Apr 2021 12:27
Lawrence13, for what its worth, I will give you my take on your observations,
Problems:
- Incompetent management I have already made my thoughts clear on the new guys performance up to now, but it is early days and we do need to give them a chance. But If you compare these to Peter and Pavel, these have NOT nearly brought the company to its knees. I commented many times on what I deemed, either incompetence, or events or occurrences that just did not add up. I know Peter and Pavel had an influence on building the pox hub, I also know there were a lot of negatives as well. So Jury is out on that one, but, apart from communication there is nothing to suggest they are any worse, unless YOU Prove different.
- No trust in management by staff, That is heresay, where is the proof ?? Apart from an interim CEO being denied access to a building we owned
- third party concentrate suppliers don’t trust the company or its owners Absolute load of rubbish, They need us, more than we need them.
- nothing being spent on exploration. We are spending money on the Pioneer flotation plant , look at the cash in hand, we have not got masses for exploration at the moment as the priority is the flotation plants.
- Strukov on site fighting fires." Ridiculous quote, Stukhov, has a boatload of refractory ore he wants processed, if he was in charge, you can bet your bottom dollar, he would be getting it processed on the cheap. Reality is he is not.
Lets just remember, he isn't the owner, he is a large shareholder. I and other people who hold shares or also shareholders, the only benefit he has, is he has more voting rights, it does not give him any more decision rights than you or me.
There is a board of directors, I believe, he has 1 representative, the board is being increased, that will give him even less influence.