Member Info for RuckRover

"The price you buy in at is extremely important"
My point is, it's less important on a multi-bagger than a share you are hoping to make a couple of percent.
IF these were to make a £1, they would have been a good buy at 50p - you've doubled your money. So I wouldn't feel bad about anyone who paid 29p recently. If you want to sympathise, what about those who paid 65p nearly nine years ago? I wonder if any are still holding?

No he wasn't, neither was Tolstoy apparently (War and Peace)

AB,
Not sure why people get so het up about buy in price. It's the price you sell at that's important. If these get to £1 there's little difference buying at 29p rather than 26p.

Morning C7, All,
Another Tolstoy-esque post!
Well, just waiting for that RNS informing us on progress of Scov1 and funding news. It can't be far off and when it lands we will be in the 30s at least.

AB,
Just to be clear, I think Hasiba was wrong to disrespect Bermuda, as you say, one of if not the most knowledgeable posters around. Everyone, including hasiba, are entitled to follow their own investment strategy - especially if it has worked for them over the long term.

I'm not sure why people get so upset just because another has a different investment strategy to themselves.
So what if Hasiba bails out and pulls the rip cord? He will walk away with 78% profit in 4 months. How many of us have achieved that in 8 years?

Ivy,
Very true, both sides of the argument have credibility. There is no doubt that Scancell do have the funding to run p1 trials. However, in order for any of us to see a return on nvestment, Scancell MUST find a partner or do a deal.
Far too many here are so convinced Scancell will succeed irrespective of their actions based purely on the science. Adopting this attitude "it's all about the science" switches off the normal sound rules of investing. Someone with a bit of commercial nouse will ruffle some feathers.

Hasiba,
Great that we finally have someone on the board with a bit of commercial realism!

TF,
Apologies if I came across harsh. It's my strong principles of truth and honesty I'm afraid.
Surely the simple thing would be for chillpill to say where he got it. The possibilities are:
It's genuine
Chillpill copied it in good faith from someone who fabricated it
Chillpill fabricated it himself.

"Cheeky little ramp"
A bit like saying "it was just a cheeky little armed robbery"
Show what some people's attitude is to over hyping a share.
Regardless of the accuracy of the statements, attributing them to someone who didn't say them is grossly misleading. We don't, at this stage know for sure whether they are authentic or not - I'm waiting for chillpill to say where he got the quote.
If I was looking to invest here, I'd be questioning the need for ramping and over-hyping if the pipeline was that good.

Knowlesi,
I'm not sure you can say news won't arrive for 10-12 weeks. If we were only talking SCIB1/MODI1 I'd agree but all the indications are from the recent media coverage on Covid vaccine is that trials will start "within weeks". So even if we did drop below 20p, I think it will be very short-lived. IMO.

TF,
He was referring to the total annual market for Mabs.

Well, in the cold light of day I'm still asking why? What was the purpose of last night's presentation. We always have a slow slide backwards in the absence of news but a session to announce there is no news just accelerates that fall.
Maybe Vulpes are fed up being asked to sell to provide liquidity and this is another way of doing it - cause a bit of a sell-off.

LL,
That doesn't take into account the convertible loan notes, so 14.6 "fully diluted"

LL,
14.6p per share?
I should hope not.

Thanks Bermuda,
Sounds sensible but the concept of vaccinating people AFTER they have contacted the disease is a little strange.

Thanks WTP,
At least his irrelevant posts makes CH seem exciting.

GF,
Wasn't it you that said 28p will be hard to break through?

Berm,
Just to be clear...
You are talking about people vaccinated AFTER they have contracted Covid?

GF,
"So why do you think SK is being so negative tonight then?"
Why negative? Why not realistic? Or cautious?