Member Info for RuckRover

“ It is the difference between asking sensible questions, which AI methods can provide a steer on, and ridiculous questions which AI isn’t remotely equipped to answer!”

Oh sorry, I’d made the assumption it was sensible people asking sensible questions. I’d not taken into account the stupidity of this board.

EE,

“ using ai analysis of complex genomic and biological data mountains in order to sift out better candidates for reasearch is one thing. spreading meaningless bull**** is another ”

No it’s not, they are the same. You can’t accuse AI of churning out BS when it comes to trivial morsels of investment related speculation and then say it’s spot on for complex bio-science. The machine learning applies the same principles.

What you term BS is simply what you don’t want to hear. I guess the radiographers who are told their assessments are wrong in certain cases feel the same way.

CW,

Your 12:45 spot on.

Those who “skip over” AI are completely ignorant of its uses and contribution in almost every field of human activity.

“Sorry if I took the name of your deity in vain old chap.”

No apologies necessary, no names were mentioned.

“ Indeed - beware of false prophets sharing their 'wisdom.'”

Well, if you are going biblical the proof of a true prophet is that their prophecies come true. I’m not seeing £8 per share so whoever said that must fall into the “false prophet” category or even “false profit”.

Declaration:

No AI was used in the generation of this post.

AB,

Well said, my thoughts exactly. Those who fail to embrace AI will be at a disadvantage as they ignore an influential component. Whether it is correct or not is secondary, what matters is whether anyone believes it. People falling for complete rubbish was going on long before AI.

I can only assume people’s reluctance to engage is either due to fear or ignorance.

If there is ever an investment fund run entirely by AI I’d be investing. AI has access to more information and doesn’t suffer the emotional attachment humans have to a share/company/ideology.

For those interested in learning about the future of AI, read “Life 3.0”

Let me rephrase that for clarity

It doesn’t seem the the fabled “non-dilutive funding” is that far away now.

TF,

I had seen it yesterday but didn’t click rec - I have just corrected that now.

It was a symbolic gesture I’d say. £1m isn’t a lot in terms of what is going to be needed just to get SCIB2 through trials. It doesn’t seem that the fabled “non-dilutive funding” may not be far away now.

“ Interesting that he makes a public comment like that to Scancell.”

Which he probably wouldn’t have if there was anything going on between the two companies.

Kash,

I use Halifax in a s &s ISA. They don’t normally appear on LSE or ADVFN but on some other platforms I can’t remember the name of

“ Market equally unimpressed early on!”

What was the market expecting an £8 per share bid from a big pharmaceutical company as an opening offer?

I was unimpressed this morning when I got up and saw the grass was green and the sky was still blue.

angelo,

"well, in my humble opinion, the market very rarely gets it wrong,"

i guess you've just finished your economics degree and been indoctrinated with "efficient market theory" rubbish?

the theory is based on assumptions as follows:

"investors are rational and profit-maximizing."

no, they are completely irrational

"all relevant information is freely available and quickly disseminated."

no it's not, many have inside information, and what is released is slow to digest

"prices adjust instantly to new data."

*******s they do. news takes 3/4 days to sink in before reverting to where it was.

it is fairly obvious that given scancell's pipeline and the potential worth of the market they address that the sp should be between 24 and 36p. this is what brokers are saying even taking into account risk and the time it will take to materialise.

"But the question remain valid"

Yes, as valid as it's ever been.

EE,

"But the NEXT six months?"

Yes, but we've said that every six months for years!

Ray,

Yes, you never know. Burnley could win the premier league!

EE,

"in the event that we get 2-3 big pieces of news in the next few months and in short order, it may turn out to be extremely expensive."

The reality is, there has never been a time in the past 13 years where being out would have cost you a significant amount of money.

Jamboian,

Totally agree with you. Apart from MODI1 data, iSCIB+ data, Genmab news and anything we haven't been told about, absolutely nothing on the horizon.

Kash,

Wow, yes, a real blast from the past!

I bought into protherics when the were called Proteus back in around 1994. Their lead product if I remember was a BSE test. It was either that or a rattlesnake antidote. I invested in a couple around that time and get them mixed up. One was bought by BTG the other by Shield diagnostics (I think David Evan’s was Chairman.

Small world isn’t it?

C11,

Yes I got the humour, what did you want - 43 laughing emojis?

I thought it was a good opportunity to make a serious point 😂

"Lindy already has one of those between her ears."

Thankfully she doesn't. Supercomputers are great for doing the grunt work like weather simulation, genomics and drug simulations. They perform at mind blowing speed quadrillion instructions per second.

What we have in our CSO is imagination, intuition, creativity, persistence and passion. They haven't build a computer with those attributes yet.

There are uses for high powered computers in Scancell's research and I'm sure they will have access to what they need through LD's academic connections. It would be good to see a level playing field though.