RE: Worried - not in the slightest31 Aug 2020 16:11
It seems there is a financial illiterate, on this forum who doesn’t understand the ND/EBITDA terms.
I appreciate stackhigh doesn’t want to school this individual so I’ll attempt to.
The Net Debt (ND) to Earnings Before Interest Depreciation and Amortisation (EBITDA) ratio is a debt ratio that shows how many years it would take for a company to pay back its debt.
Lenders will often undertake covenant tests, usually after each financial year to test the company on their earnings and ability to honour their loans and debts.
Pre-Coronavirus, Cineworld’s Net Debt being $3.5 Billion had a 3.4 ND/EBITDA ratio. Which was very low (under 5 is considered good) and was used to support covenant testing by lenders to install confidence that they were in a good place to pay back their debt.
Source (Financials at a Glance, Slide 4): https://www.cineworldplc.com/sites/cineworld-plc/files/2020-03/2019-full-year-presentation_0.PDF
It’s no secret that Coronavirus has impacted footfall and we have seen Q2 have zero income.
What investors need to be aware of is that Cineworld have negotiated some changes to their ND/EBITDA ratio to give them more breathing space to get through the current pandemic and reduced footfall.
Cineworld have had their ND/EBITDA ratio increased to 9.0 to support the testing covenant due 31 December 2020. This means when the lenders crunch the numbers, they will account for REDUCED income and a higher debt ratio. This is favourable as one cannot expect a company in leisure like Cineworld to perform at levels pre-Coronavirus until we see a vaccine in place and footfall back to its pre levels.
We know that in 2019, Cineworld scored a very good EBITDA of $1033m which resulted in a ND/EBITDA of just 3.4x ($3500m/$1033m). This kept lenders very satisfied that Cineworld were comfortably within revenue making headroom to clear the much more generous 5.5x ratio they imposed, which would have seen EBITDA needing to come in at a minimum of $636m. So to put that into perspective, Cineworld scored 62% higher in the test and easily passed to keep the lenders happy that Cineworld would be good to honour their debts.
Given the lenders have now provided a much more GENEROUS ND/EBITDA of 9.0x, to put that into perspective, Cineworld, at a minimum, to satisfy their net debt of $3500m, need a EBITDA of JUST $388m.
What is that as a percentage comparable to 2019? 37% ($1033m/$388m). Cineworld can pass their covenant test on the basis they can demonstrate profit earnings, EBITDA of just 37% of 2019.
In short, Cineworld is NOT facing imminent collapse and DOES NOT need to undertake a rights issue, as some commentators would like you to believe.