RE: RD25 Jun 2020 23:07
Whispers - this is just between us.
It started with a post from Rich Ken this morning. Seemed to take offence at something. Post got deleted.
The other chap is well informed, makes some great points but sensitive. I do my best not to play the man until they make it personal - at that point its fair game. So it kinda spiralled and seemed to become really important. Opinions on a BB really are not that level of seriousness but I accept my attitude is a bit light hearted for some.
It feels a little about a chat room for football teams. PL75 has experience in strategic analysis - jeez we should be falling over ourselves to hear from him. Orphidian has experience in R&D - its incredibly useful. Monks head is unbelievable well informed. The response to different opinions varies though. For me that's the difference
Disagree with me is cool, present me with contrary evidence, brilliant. Don't really care if its not running around with pom poms and there is a reason why proper analysis considers competition, weaknesses and threats. If what we need is someone to say you have made a brilliant decision consider it done - I'm invested here, done my own analysis - don't need affirmation (did you see what I did there)