Member Info for RorkesDrift

First prize to whoever gets called Twat firsr

This feels like standing on the exit of a Hercules about to make a jump. Can I scream "stop pushing"

If you can dodge a spanner....

Is this like one of those rugby club raids where we nick their mascot?

I'll hold your coat G

If Lansdowne are selling a lot of shares then that implies supply is outstripping demand. If so the price falls to attract new buyers. The MM maintains a spread sine its Lansdowne continually taking the hit.???

This is going to sound nieive. Are stocks not governed by supply and demand. If price is falling then there would be fewer sellers. Furthermore, there would be more buyers.

I understand that a MM might have an order to fill but wouldn't that just close the spread. They cannot put the price up and make money but at same time there comes a point where the price has to attract enough sellers. Also surely for every sell there eventually has to be a sell. Who is not to say someone sold a lot, price dropped and then someone bought a lot.

Should come in handy. Written within last ten years as well

The list is missing DONE in the appropriate places but looks as authentic as any other list. It enables discussion at least.

Not an expert but I think CE mark requires clinical (ie real world) validation. I've mentioned it before but user testing will be important - whatever any self claimed expert says.

Apologies. Bump

Richard Dobbs

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/here-s-how-the-covid-nightmare-could-be-over-by-christmas/amp?__twitter_impression=true&s=09

£400M not £400k. I'm not that pessimistic

Agreed. The nod and a wink during the fund raise was Stem Printer was imminent. I'm going with £400k value for that - the Chairman said £200M.

CEO makes a big thing out of very little so I'm not putting too much on the therapeutics at this stage. Looks like the market agrees. Using another drugs results to imply same effect is a step outside of trust worthy. I've made note to myself not to watch any of the bull**** videos he does.

You make a good point about the II - also makes me think they may know something that we don't - I presume they had face to face meetings. If not we might struggle if we need to raise more cash in future £200M would see us through so a sale rather than float makes more sense - if we can find someone willing to pay it. Again smoke and mirrors and implied stuff just to drive short term SP.

So I am hanging in - either the price will continue to fall to my buy in (about £1) or news will come out. To be honest I'll exit at either of those points based on CEO. As a huge share holder, source of info and employee I don't think its healthy that his aims are probably not aligned to small share holders.

So if BJ says it then his big orange mate will have to say it - likes to associate his administration with it. Words will be "we have enabled etc etc $XB etc etc. Within 48 hours.

Sorry.

https://www.insidermedia.com/news/yorkshire/aptamer-group-and-cytiva-to-collaborate-on-covid-19-rapid-test

They are also working with aptamer group

Similar here - I heard my kids talking about their day at school and saying it was a s4 it test.

My assumption. To do a tech transfer you must be pretty happy with the tech. The opposite would be you are not happy with the tech but are going to transfer it anyway.

So Cytiva and Avacta are satisfied with in lab performance at time of transfer.

Feedback from Liverpool might influence stuff but given we recently signed up a second supplier possibly not

So hold up might not be a hold up. Just normal (see DOH manual on load bearing walls).

If there is a fault or frustration then its about communication. A large % of posts state how great the NEED is including all govts recognise this. Early timelines were optimistic but then silence (into which people could state anything and not be verified). So why the silence from Avacta, Cytiva and suppliers.

I believe part of it is political. If you look at IHC (no longer have position) they state ventilators suffered export ban despite Trump claiming to supply the world. Vaccines is another USA first. Given the impact of testing and likely initial supply issues the companies and governments would want to make sure they have resilience in supply chains but no one wants to launch a test and then row back. I think lack of comes is unfortunate but none of us have any insight - you can be sure big IIs are wanting same answers. Look at Synairgen - again fairly quiet - why? Cause no one wants to get in a highest bidder war with Trump - short term win but gain pariah status (Gilead we are looking at you).

I'm worried we have been stitched up

Thank you.

I've no idea how long it takes. In do know if you fold a piece of string in half its not as long.

Oh hang on...