Member Info for RorkesDrift

Tech transfer never ever fails

Unless of course it does

https://www.pharmtech.com/view/tech-transfer-tearing-down-wall

Is the current version for the delay because

A. Klaus and friends are navel gazing
B. A reliable friend says it down to tooling issue
C. They have to add some sort of buffer to neutralise live virus

Its just that I've lost track but there again after over thirty years in the industry and two degrees (I don't like to mention 1st and distinction) I lose track of what I'm meant to believe instead of the official avacta position.

Chill. His Lord5h1t3 is 10 years out of date and its amazing how many people refer to him rather than the official RNS.

I just hope those lot on 4D and BMN are happy now they caused him to leave. Shame.

Which version of Orphidians time line was his self reference to. I've lost track its changed that often so you cannot really blame Sir Al that he let the great man down.

Full marks though for having a go though - its too easy to bash someone who doesn't get it right on multiple efforts.

The congregation will now sing Hymn 47. "I touched the hem of his garment" in A minor after which battered sausage followed by humble pie will be served by the ladies of the North.

Not sure TL bashing the stock. I also think you know that.

Sounds like the battering sausage has been passed on?

In 2012, GSK pleaded guilty to promotion of drugs for unapproved uses, failure to report safety data, and kickbacks to physicians in the United States and agreed to pay a US$3 billion (£1.9bn) settlement. It was the largest health-care fraud case to date in that country and the largest settlement by a drug company.

Correct

I am reliably informed all future zoom calls will take place from his infinity pool situated at the top of his Dr No island

Shirley it must be Avacta. Who else could it be.

Tak for posting

Does the wonderful Mrs Nial know any fishwives - all welcome here.

I'm torn between Sir Al is getting out whilst the going is good and is paying cash for a flat above the Weather by Whaler and he is buying a country estate with the mahoosive amount of cash he will soon have as CEO of a £20B company.

Debate.....

Uberstoogie in other parts of the vorld.

"Mine gott Hans. Vat an uberstoogie dat vas. Mit deese uberstoogies du art spoiling us already"

"One of the major factors leading to the common dilution of saliva is its viscosity, which is typically high and variable depending on the individual and level of salivation at the moment of testing. This viscosity is a result of mucin proteins which are one of the primary components of saliva. Food particles contribute to this issue of viscosity as well and pose a problem when trying to flow a sample through the test strip. This ultimately will result in highly inconsistent test results. Besides viscosity, the mucin proteins also to be very "sticky" and often interfere with antigen-antibody binding. Overall this makes saliva a very challenging matrix to work with, especially considering that many salivary biomarkers are present in extremely low concentrations."

Has she got a sister?

What I don't understand is if you have 0.9% of a company's stock do you not have to be careful about avoiding accusations of market manipulation when you comment in public forums. If you were doubling up on 750,000/shares again you think you would be avoiding comment.

From a safety perspective, a 2-month median follow-up (meaning that at least half of vaccine recipients in clinical trials have at least 2 months of follow-up) after completion of the full vaccination regimen will allow identification of potential adverse events that were not apparent in the immediate postvaccination period and will also provide greater confidence in their absence, if none are observed. Adverse events considered plausibly linked to vaccination generally start within 6 weeks after vaccine receipt

Might be worth bookmarking for top of the range scientific covid updates
.https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00502-w

We don't know how effective a vaccine is. Closest analogy is flu vaccine and we know that isn't perfect. So tests will be needed but the scale and therefore future revenues will be influenced by vaccines.

I have always thought the test will be needed in short term in significant amounts. Over time though we have to believe this disease will become less prevelent - therefore the need for testing reduces. A new norm where everyone tests for ever probably isn't viable.

Epidemiology and testing might help. Verging into deep water there though

Can I ask - should healthcare workers take a vaccine. Should your barber / hairdresser (Vegas) take a vaccine. Should the person working behind the til or stocking shelves in Wait rose take a vaccine. Should the bar lady at your local pub take a vaccine. Should anyone in a high risk group take a vaccine. Should anyone taking a vaccine pay for the healthcare costs of anyone who doesn't.

I don't know the answers - i have had a stack of vaccines in my life -/most people in the UK have. I'm not sure why there is such a strong anti-vax movement but I don't think a test is going to be public ally funded or accepted in lieu of vaccination. For example yellow fever vaccination is required to enter many countries. You cannot turn up at immigration and ask for a test. People take path of least resistance - hence Pfizer making lots of vaccines.

https://www.alamy.com/the-night-singer-of-shares-sold-stock-on-the-streets-during-the-south-sea-bubble-amsterdam-1720-image333791642.html

Agreed - visit the Avacta website. After a couple of weeks cut and paste here.