RE: Upwards move19 Oct 2025 07:19
So you think landstead would just change their whole approach now and start holding the shares they use to cover their payments? Why when they havnt done that once yet?
They are still up on the deal anyway so why wouldn’t they cover their payments by selling the remainding shares? Their profit is in the warrants, they don’t care about holding the shares they were issued, so again, just another desperate attempt to try and spin a negative.
Secondly, even if you forget landstead the main benefit is for Tim (and us PIs) it plugs the selling and the sp rises substantially with no seller to feed it. This makes a higher base to negotiate from.
It seems you have resorted to just making up blatant lies (again) to try and convince yourself and others that you have made the right call by selling up.
Apologies- You are right about Hargreaves’s which hold 19% of imm, I’m Not sure what percentage they own and what percentage is client based so at worst take 19% of that 80% figure and you still have a huge amount of shares locked up.