Poor timing?12 Oct 2020 20:05
Well! Take a day out visiting the great grand-kids and the usual calm of this board has evaporated! I seem to recall from previous SG policy pronouncements that the plan was to finance phase 2 and exploration from phase 1 production profits, but all that seems to have changed in the blink of an eye! Has NLR become impatient to achieve his 'significant Scottish mining industry and get an honour for it?
Did SG not learn from their excellent timing of the raise just after the BPT !st gold pour in 2016 with an SP of ~£10 eq? Had they waited (IMO) until after the 1st production gold pour, then they might have achieved an SP of ~£2 and a placing ~£1.50. Hence some of the euphoria today seems a little OTT.
Perhaps I'm being a little churlish, as I sold out in 2016 for £10.04 eq, but last week did the unheard of action by me, of buying into a rising SGZ share and averaging up! It must have been the euphoria of my profit-taking by selling out of ERIS for +50%, LoL!
On thoughts, I might have seen this raise coming with the appointment of 2 new geos in August, who would of course want to make progress (that I've called for often) and need funds, plus the torrent of SG tweets and incentive shares for the contractor to achieve re-stated production start-up date. Such acceleration does not come without costs and hence need of funds PDQ!
One further thought that no-one has mentioned is the very real risk of possible disruption from the pandemic! Hopefully that can be avoided at SG, but delays are expensive and a bolster to finances so that phase 1 income is not the sole provider does make sense.
I've waffled enough! A good time to again look down the back of the sofa?
Regards to all, R.
PS. Morar, many happy returns!