RE: Re : FinnFCR11 Aug 2019 18:18
There is little sign of it.
My investment decision was based on geology - which TW doesn't understand. It was based on transit issues - which TW doesn't understand and geopolitics which TW doesn't get. The size of my investment was proportioned according to the finances of the company which unfortunately were not fully revealed and are a valid argument for some but not how they presented on the bb. The other TW stuff about fraud was noise - I'd actually like to see litigation towards TW, preferably by the FCA or SEC in that regard and dismissal of the super major claim by TW is also now proved to be wrong.
The fact that this company is alive at this juncture and has the board vouching for its solvency is the only evidence that exists, as far as I know, that the dream of a golden era is still alive. I can't find that evidence in video but I guess you didn't mean that.
I've got other guesses about a multitude of issues but they are guesses. It is the evidence of a pulse that keeps the shorters coming back here.