Member Info for richlist

The AZN aerosphere looks like it is a maintenance treatment for COPD.
Synairgen interferon-beta would be a time limited treatment at the time of getting a virus, not for chronic use.
So, they are not competing.

I agree, thank you Notes.
Also, they are now running a covid at home trial for nebulised interferon-beta and needing to recruit.
Eligibility criteria
Within 72 hours of symptom onset.
Over 65, or over 50 with one of their list of co-morbid conditions.
Slightly tech literate.

Sorry also off topic, but should the need arise a 50% chance of getting what seems to be a good treatment might make a big difference to someone you know, so not really apologising for spreading the word on this. I would join if they would let me in!

All that plus the mask with a hole for the straw and the visor gets a bit cumbersome and itchy. Seems to be what everyone is wearing at the Dog and Ferret these days though. :)

Hard to overhear things now at the Dog and Ferret or Rampers Arms with social distancing.

Taskmaster.
This must depend on how fast you want to charge and the battery capacity of the car you are using.

Muscorum that seems a very logical question.
I once tried a 'back of the fag packet ' on how many solar panels you would need to run an EV charger at home. I was shocked. I don't remember details, but I would have had to buy a small field.
So maybe the solar offers some of the energy they need, but some of it is also provided by extra hydrogen they will bring with them.

I get what you are saying and would also expect this great news to increase the value of the company and hence the share price.
But another factor today is the issue (recent and forthcoming) of around 200 million shares at 16p. Sitting on a 50% profit some will be tempted to sell and that will dampen the effect of this news, fantastic as it is.

Have to dispute this header title.
For the people who bought the large number of shares at 16p they are now sitting on over 50% profit.
A lot of value has been added for them.

Half year results next week, so hopefully we will get an update on how things are going in other areas.
Exciting times after all these years.

McPhy make electrolysers and have links with De Nora, could be theirs maybe.

The RNS says the Extreme E release was made because Extreme E planned to announce it at a virtual summit, so AFC were forced to release it now under MAR rules.
I think MAR rules 14, 16, 17, 47, 55 and Article 7 offer guidance on when it should have been released.

This is fantastic news! Well done AFC!

Amazing that the solution includes an electolyzer, so this is a whole off grid balanced power supply solution for off grid locations. Could have a lot of applications in remote locations. What about green paradise island hotels. Richard Branson, do you need an update on Necker Island?

The electrolyzer looks new, but I see there is mention of electrolyzers in 'auxillary equipment' on the website, so it may be made by someone else and just engineered into a complete solution by AFC.

Also note the RNS is headed by 'The information communicated within this announcement is deemed to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014. Upon the publication of this announcement, this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.' So they are aware of the rules they should be following on notifications. Could you read through this and adhere to it please AFC.

Muscorum, reporting obligations are not a matter of opinion, but are clearly defined in the AIM rules and Market Abuse Regulations which were updated in 2014 with a view to increased transparency, market regulation and shareholder protection. I have been reading them in the past week and find them very enlightening. I would just like to see these clear obligations being met.

croqman.
They would have various options.
It is only until the next AGM, so quite a short time.
They could use the 31.6 million they had in the bank.
They still have the Thalion funding of a futher 4 million.
If they expect to have spent all that before the next AGM they could call a GM and ask us at the time with an explanation of why it is needed and the price per share they expect to get.
I just don't see the need to write a blank cheque at this point with 31 million in the bank.
I hope 31 million should be enough to develop some shareholder value so that we can be clear there won't be another huge fundraise at 16p.

I hope I got it right second time AnnOwl, but that is my take on it.

I have voted no to all the resolutions. but agree it will not make a difference.
My concern is that with the lack of transparency and so much 'going on behind the scenes' the share price may not reflect the true value of the company and 16p may not be a reasonable price to give so much of it away.

If all issued I think that would bring us to a total of 899,066,226 shares in total, so a slight difference.

I think I need to make a slight correction to my posts over the weekend now I have understood what pre-emptive rights are.
I think what they are asking for in the GM resolutions are:

resolution 2 Authority to issue 33% extra shares on the final shares in issue after the £31.6 million fundraising. These would have pre-emptive rights, which I think means we can take part in any fundraise.
resolution 3 Authority for 10% of these shares to be without pre-emptive rights, so can be disposed of without our having rights to take part in any fundraise.

So what they are asking for is an extra 33% of shares to be available.
My concern is where they will go and at what price. AFC should not need further funds surely when they have £31.6 million in the bank. If this was for a partnership agreement it would be good for the company, but in that case why not just raise funds via a partnership agreement. Why the need to sell half the company and do both.

And if there is good reason to give away half the company all good, but I do object to the price of 16p a share for it.

Eligible for capital gains tax is profit across the whole account for the tax year (plus any other capital gains liability you might have). Then you deduct the threshold and have to pay a percentage on any profits over the threshold.

It still counts if you leave the profits in the account.
It is not just on money you have taken out to buy sweets, cars, yachts.

ps I meant this is the amount you would need to declare as eligible for capital gains tax.

Capital gains from this and any other things need to exceed the threshold for the year before you would have to pay any CGT and then it is at a percentage of the profits above that threshold. Not sure what it all is for this year.

Sharesport - after painful experience of working this out, it goes like this.

Profit you declare from the trading account will be:
Sale price for shares-purchase price for that number of shares.

but which shares to choose.
sale price obviously the ones you sold
purchase price shares are like this.
First in line are price for any you bought on the same day as the sale
Second in line are any you bought in the 30 days prior to the sale
Third in line are your average price S104 holding shares.

So in this case, CGT on the trading account transaction will be:
sale price of 20,000 shares from trading account - purchase price of 20,000 Primarybid shares.
This applies as long as you complete the bed and isa within 30 days of buying the Primarybid shares. After that the purchase price will be the average price of your S104 holding.