Thanks for your insight (not)28 Jan 2026 22:04
Well now GTJD,----- thanks for finding time in your busy schedule to give us some of your words of wisdom, and your opinion on it all.-
-As you say, --"where does one start " but i'll try.--
--" Well the ruling is fair in my opinion" ---luckily its not your opinion that counts, and the company sees it differently than you do, and we are appealing.-
-
-"Its Ironic that the funding article appeared within a few days of the court announcement,"----that may well have been the other way round, with the funding article already in the pipeline and the court case coming before it could go to print.
-
----"That funding will go along way to paying creditors off."----well if I read the article correctly the funding is expected to be between $200--$300 mill, so just how much debt are you trying to tell us we have ---(including Brightwaters I bet it's not more the $50 mill).
-
--"I don't know enough about the 2016 loan note being called in that would enable them to increase equity,"----maybe best not comment on that then eh ?
-
---" I am assuming that would be in Eroton as ELI is a defunct company now, "----- if you saying that the holding SLE has in ELI is worthless ?---then you should consider your statement about the funding being nearly complete.--If $200-$300 mill in SLE bank accounts will sort any problems ELI may have and increase SLE's stake into the bgn (you work it out)--- we could finish up with over 70% of ELI.
-
--"If that equity increase goes through, good news indeed, SLE will have increased their position within Eroton's equity share of OML18, that is about where it stops, it would just be an increased equity position."----so increasing their % in Eroton (and indirectly in OML:18) is not worth doing , according to you.??-
-
---"Solvency v insolvency, an interesting question, only SLE know this"---yes they do, and so would Mr Justice Kennedy, if he had taken the trouble to ask for the management accounts. (again we are appealing that ruling)
-
--"I wouldn't get excited about building a pipeline and operating an FSO as that contract is terminated and dead and its never coming back to life"-----where on the earth do you get that idea from ???----The pipeline is there, the FSO is there---sort the debts (funding remember)-and the pipe and fso are very much alive.-
-
--"I said this before the block doesn't need 2 x FSOs and 2 x Evacuation Pipelines."-----the "block" won't have 2x2---the other one is for OML 10, remember.
-
----"My advice to SLE on their fund raise, increase is to clear the debts,"----we've been through that, don't try and make out our debts are way way bigger than they actually are.
-
---" But like I said a few weeks ago, if there was anyone who needed good news it was you guys and if this deal comes off, I shall raise"-------No you wont---you and your forked tongue will disappear back into the shadows along with your other sly posters.