Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
This is getting silly now...all the total credibility destruction from Brockham has been factored in,this is just getting plainly ridiculous...1.50 should be where it's stuck.
It looks like insiders are shorting it.GL does NOTHING to arrest the fall or bolster the sp.A reassuring interview might help or him buying shares.
Only one way for investors to get their money back now.
I'd recommend all investors to attend the "Pandoras box" conference in Derby on September 1st,where they will be talking about the same pattern in all AIM oilers...they will be devoting half of it to Angus,and also covering Range Resources and Red Emperor.
Yep.thats absolutely right Jaffa..wheels are in motion ...
Scally
I seriously hope Balcombe does add value to my decimated investment,but it's disappointing that there haven't been any updates regarding that so far.The BOD don't seem to have any sense of urgency.
This time I didn't (for once) mention suing,but since you brought it up,would a "no win,no.fee" percentage deal attract you?
Scally
Angus didn't prove that Brockham wasn't viable at all.They claimed emphatically on February 4th that it was,based on the firm evidence of geochemical analysis,and abandoned it on June 28th without even flow testing it to finally determine it one way or another.
In fact,they'd already been in negotiations with "third parties" for weeks , whilst updating us in rns' statements that the next stage would be flow testing.There may well be commercial Kimmeridge in there, but theit goal seems to be to asset strip and flog Brockham.
Yes JTP has been drawing a good salary and share options in spite of his abject failure.It's time to make him reach into his own pocket-as with the other directors and PV,and compensate the investors who've been swindled out of their hard earned cash,by a systematic pattern of misleading statements-a pattern that is replicated in AIM oiler after oiler, pump it up knowing youre building false expectations, and dump it leaving shareholders 80 to 95% down.
This is going to stop .
********************
APACHE007 and DAZ103
I feel your pain.I also bought in double figures.It's an utter scandal,lie after false premise after deceit after **** up.We deserve to have our money back,this is one big confidence scam.Your only chance is to join our action
Email ********************
Yes indeed Jaffa
Not only proves that JTP illegally shorted Angus with a dodgy outfit that had only been arounda short while,but also that Chris De Grooy who was a non exec director of Angus and signed off on the end statements,had also on the board of Xodus, who produced an "independent "report on the potential oil productivity of Lidsey.
No I can accept losing money on a purely speculative venture,but I do object to being defrauded and mislead in the most blatant of ways abs having my money stolen.
It is CRIMINAL. .
What utter b**""where did you get this utter fantasy from?-I'm not a member of the labour party.or Amy party ..but even if I was, it's irrelevant ...
And BUTD by the way..this company claimed to be an oil producer not a speculative explorer..and made certain emphatic assertions about the vplume of oil ..so not gambling at ll but a falsification of the facts with intent to deprive investors. .
You really are a nasty piece of work,showunfortunately such contempt for investors here. ..maybe you are one of the directors ?-one else who have successfully contempt?
BUTD you're obviously a gatekeeper for the BOD,and that why you can't view this objectively.
Well I think I will trust the professional opinion of a Cambridge educated barrister over that of a BOD stooge any day.
Your agenda is obviously to bat forcthe BOD..because how could anyone dispassionately say,with the sheer volume of evidence we have..that it "hasn't got legs"...unless you're a QC of course...
BUTD
Well that's where you're wrong..because it isn't a threat at all..it's a promise that is already being actioned.And the lawyers-a partner in a firm of city solicitors-and a barrister who is an expert in financial services and a law professor to boot-are collecting evidence from a very large number of investors via a questionnaire.
Many of the poster's on here will confirm that this action is real..jaffa,gkb,rxdav...
Surrey lad
You have a very good point there, and yes the individuals who orchestrated this confidence scam must be held accountable.
Jaffas
Agree 110%!-the deceit and misrepresentation if the facts is so blatant, so obvious and so egregious that it's a no brainer.
Croqman yes
The BOD know the names of all investors here who have accused them of fraudulent activity....so what?-they won't sue us because they know IT'S TRUE!-
Pete Boo
Yes!-that's me,I'm co-ordinating the Angus action,and that's correct,individual investors won have to pay a penny because third party funding and crowd justice crowdfunding is available.
Legal action against the individual directors and nomads (for failure to provide regulatory due diligence) would mean that the survival of Angus wasn't affected.
Will Coyote
I'm not 'twisting' the facts merely stating them-every year Angus has done quite a number of placings and it's simply realistic to expect more.
And I'm not the only one who i's bitter -97% of investors bought above the current sp. .so 2.5p is total and utter crap to most investors. ..and from 14p before Christmas to this price..there really is only ONE way to recoup your losses
Will C
So even Saltfeedby..and a £13 million market cap only brings us to 2.5p....still massively below the pre Brockham price of 4p..so a totally useless and hopeless situation for those that bought at 4p and above. ...utterly hopeless for anyone who bought at 7,8,10,12,15 or the 20s..has absolutely no chance of recovering their money here..even with Saltfeedby and Balcombe,which don't start until next year,by which time there will probably have been half a dozen new placings...and we will be over diluted like UKOG.
The ONLY chance LTH''s have of recovering their investment is to join our Angus energy investors action. The lawyers now have abundant proof of the negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation of the oil potential of the assets. The BOD have also behaved with what us called in company law "Unfair prejudice" -in an inept way or on a way detrimental to the interests of shareholders.This alone is sufficient grounds for compensation,without even needing to prove deceit.
Also,we have been informed that we can claim recompense from individual directors,withour in any way imperiling the survival of the company.
The nomads(Angus' advisers) are also liable for lack of due diligence,in not issuing an MAR (market abuse regulation) which is required,when the volume of selling or rapid share price falls,are unusual abs can't be explained.
If you are an LTH who has lost out substantially because of the Lidsey and Brockham fiascos,please email me and I will send you the form you need to join our action-individuals pay nothing as third party funding is provided
keither197@gmail.com
El Al
If Saltfeedby had viable or substantial reserves,they wouldn't be giving it away,but selling it for a commercial price-business is business after all.
OK it produced in the past,but the Portland also produced well in the past.