Member Info for ratcliffewriter

Cleanerworld - quite recently he said 'Many might not be around to see the Company produce any significant scientific breakthrough that leads to the income generation people expect.' So I'm presuming he won't be around for the rest if this year. With some of his vehement posts I suspect he is also tied up at his local A and E seeking treatment for a bullet wound to the foot and it looks like a couple of his mates have gone with him.

Thursday afternoon you say? Would that be OK up to 3pm or is that too early? It's just that I'm rearranging my sock drawer at 3pm and maybe busy till gone 4.30.

WTP - I think those who trust and have followed the company for a good long while will be sufficiently laid back to think it will happen when it happens, so why worry. On the other hand, the RNS today looks to me as if they have spent a vast amount of time making sure this is spot on before launching it, but it is now launching as a well organised and complete entity. My own feeling is this is now going to move quite rapidly, especially if initial data is reported in H2. Won't put a timescale on it as the usual suspects will no doubt appear in due course with bellyfulls of pessimism and negativity and try to twist anything I say, but 'relatively soon' sounds reasonable.

On March 11th when the sp was 11.375 Kashdog said 'can’t resist these prices, I cannot see a downside'. Those of us with a sense of humour will remember a few days ago he then said he wouldn't buy at any price ever, and then that he was waiting for 6p. Oddly, both those posts seem to have disappeared, much like Kashdog now that the sp is rising.
Great RNS, and as I have said before, works of art take time.

Would have though they would RNS a departure like that.

Tragic indeed my big ami. Good try, 'close but no cigar' as they say.

Priceless! I know AB124 isn't Aimbig, and not connected in any way to an organised boiler room crew whatsoever (because he has told us so, and so it has to be true) but that's a classic and poor attempt to gain as much information as possible for use as personal and general ammunition (repeated or suitably twisted) as I have seen in a long while. But obviously it's just a polite enquiry, nothing to do with riding on Kashdog's coat tails or being part of any posting crew. Oh no, Definitely not. Heaven forbid.

Wrong again kash (and deliberately so, as ever) - you say 'which is why you have, by your own admission, deleted some of my previous posts here.' You know full well that's untrue. Any posts that get deleted are deleted by admin, not me and not by any other poster. If this were possible I'm sure you and your crew would delete all those that show your utter lack of credibility. But it's a perennial theme from you folk, much like Kenneth Williams in Carry on Cleo shouting 'Infamy, infamy, they've all got it in for me.' Grow up.

You are a very sore loser kashdog.

'You don't need a crystal ball to look back. The info is there for you to interpret (or bury your head in the sand)' - Past performance is not a guide to future performance, as they say, but as you have wilfully ignored, I say again - I make my own decisions and you have no idea at all how I buy, sell, sit on the sidelines or whatever. Please stop hinting that you have even the slightest clue.

'As for the future....you are speculating on a buyout in 2022' - AM I? I know you are a serial twister of others' posts, but PLEASE! At least try to be a little imaginative instead of a pure fiction and deciet merchant.
'I am speculating on a continuation of the trend don for reasons articulated today.' - That's your prerogative - it doesn't however make you a visionary or explain your previous contradictory posts of 'I'd never buy in again' versus 'I'd buy in at 6p.'

'Your anger posts should be directed to your own self as it is you that chose such a bad value call and spent 10.5 years promoting that bad decision, not me.' - Anger? More amazement at your persistent agenda to twist and turn and ignore genuine questions.

Crackin - you say 'If you had invested...' Exactly. You have no idea what I invest in, to what tune, or why. Stop pretending you know even the first thing about my financial situation or how I spend my time. You are as tedious as the late and unlamented Knowlesi.

I don't profess to know as my balls are not made of crystal, and nor are yours I suspect. I make any investment decisions based on my own research and feelings, and don't seek to influence others by making 'windvane' contradictory statements in an attempt to sway people to my way of thinking. You and whichever crew you work with have always been relatively transparent, but you are now being as crystal clear as your balls aren't.

Crackin - You either have a direct channel to some insider information on developments and impending news or you're full of organic farm-based fertiliser.

Instead of the pompous tone of 'When you understand value investing and risk speculation you can come back and argue the point', it would go a small way to limiting the damage to any credibility you might think you have by explaining why you go from saying you effectively wouldn't buy any shares here at any price, and then in a matter of hours setting a price at which you would buy into it. Instead of professing a deep knowledge of 'value investing', why not try basic logic?

So you do see value in buying in at some price, despite one of your other post users saying the complete opposite.

'I will wait on 6p to buy' said crackhead, shortly after posting 'I just don't see any value in me buying any more, no matter what the price.'
True to type, boring and transparent.

Oh don't worry. I have a massive bazooka, fn'aar fn'aar.

Good ramping crackhead, but I'm waiting with Knowlesi for sub 3p.

Presumably all bought below 5p for added 'sneer power.'

That'll never do. Bring on some doomie reinforcements, but give them credit for raising the spectre of finance by suggesting things may be fragile with just 30 million or so left in the bank, and possible funding via avidimab deals being turned down. How dreadfully irresponsible...