Always do the opposite of TW10 Jun 2019 21:20
TW makes the following statement: "the company’s reported profits come almost entirely not from oil and gas produced but from the most aggressive of accounting slights of hand which are completely at odds with all peer group companies"
For anyone using investopedia, Sharepad etc you will see reported profits/EPS inflated by the gain on acquisition. FACT. When you look at the company's annual report (link below) you will see:
- With the exception of reported EPS, which is not a core KPI and is as reported, not a single metric seeks to claim credit for the gain. They also disclose underlying/adj EBITDA/share;
- Adj EBITDA excludes gains on acquisition (Page 10 Annual report). Further, there is a reconciliation of EBITDA in note 6, page 63. Its is generally accepted practice to reconcile underlying and reported earnings.
- The core KPIs are operating cash flow per share, unit cash costs, realised selling prices and dividends per share. They are all either cash or operationally based. I can't see any deceit by the company to attempt to influence these metrics with aggressive acquisition accounting;
Backing the research of an anonymous job seeker without doing any research of his own is completely bizarre. TW clearly has not read the financial statements, earnings presentations or in fact done any research at all. I can't believe people pay money for this tripe.