Member Info for Quady

So many said Solgold would be sold after BHP standstill at an end.
Some said this will be over by Christmas, well Christmas has come and gone.
Many said removing NM would be good for the share price.
Many are still saying a deal is in the offing.

Now we have RNS's that state nothing has changed, and we are working towards the DFS, PFS first.
We are looking at CFP to build Alpala.

But still the same people are saying deal any minute.

NM is going to be replaced with a CEO that is going to construct Alpala and bring it to production.

What is the evidence that this is going to be sold.
Facts please, not conspiracy theories.

So Monte you don't believe what Solgold are saying.
Yes the new RNS says we are progressing to production, and looking at financing options.
So yes I believe them, why don't you.

Redknight1 that link you just posted shows that CGP now own over 8% of Solgold, if that is correct, then CGP have been buying shares on the open market.

Redknight1 read it again, it says Alpala funding options being looked at.
Sounds like we have a few ways to create a CFP for Alpala.

I will paste in the relevant part below.

SolGold is currently assessing financing options available to the Company for the development of the Alpala mine following completion of the Definitive Feasibility Study.

Certainly interesting rcgl2, this was mentioned, but didn't apply to Solgold. For me the interesting part, is the understanding of the four year rule,after permits, not from start. I believe that gives us till 2028 to construct Alpala. Also mentions various financing being looked at to build Alpala. But if the clearing up of the tax situation has a positive effect on the price, then so much for the better.

Covgaz maybe I can help you out.
Just look at the volume nobody is shorting Solgold, trust me if they were, I would know it.
It's large companies that get shorted.
If you want to check which companies are being shorted, and by how much, there are many free sites you can use.

I will post one I use, not saying it's the best, but you can also use others, as their is no shortage of information.

https://www.shortdata.co.uk/companies-top-shorted.php

Covgaz are you on about the shorting argument.

Covgaz why are you upset, shares go up and they go down.
It's not Bozi's fault.

Just look at the volumes no one is shorting Solgold.

Hello E.T. I believe there is something going on behind closed doors, they should let us know in 5 years time.

My last count is 12 drills, we where meant to have 2 more last October to take us to 14, but due to Covid, I don't think we got them.
So my guess is we have 12.

I just think with the volumes it doesn't take many sells to drive the price down.
After all we are living through Covid, and lots of PI's need the money. So are selling.
We are not even making 10 million a day on volume and even that wouldn't be good enough.
We are not on anyone's radar at the moment.

Hello Redknight1 read the post again, it is fact that NM has said we are going to production, so it's fact we are going to production. I am reiterating what has been said.
That's an observation and so fact.

As your post says smickster, it's about transition to the next stage in the construction of Alpala.

Newtoit, I have observed that Solgold have stated that their statement is to go to production.
That is a fact.
I have never said they will go to production, I have always maintained that looking at all the available facts, that production is the most likely outcome.
So many people on this site, pretend I have said something different.
I have been consistent, and not taken part in any conspiracy theories, only reminded people on here what the company have said.
Those are the observations, and hence facts.

I remember him saying it as well RICH3R, I think he meant 0.15, just a miscalculation, he probably has 3 million shares.

No such thing as own facts, facts are facts.
As I said they are observations either directly or indirectly observed.
So your facts are my facts.
I have correctly observed what Solgold have said.
Which fact have I got wrong.

Mog999 sorry I have read it and it makes my point.
It's in the and or statement.

Newtoit, I only have one ID.
Do you know what a fact is.

The scientific definition of a fact, is an observable event, which is either directly or indirectly observed.
Therefore facts are observations, that are events.
Not conspiracy theories.

Tiger you thought that Nick was such a poor CEO, that you brought CGP shares, and post on here.
I am so grateful that your posts don't support my view.