Member Info for Quady

Really addicknt, what about people who are born female by genetics and have male organs, people who are born male by genetics and have female organs. People who are born with both female and male organs.
People whose brain chemistry doesn't match their genetics.
These are the facts. no distortion just facts, which ones do you disagree with, and I will be happy to find you the scientific and medical evidence.
At times you sound intelligent, but on this not only are you wrong, you also show no emotional intelligence to people who are born different.
I guess you view the world through your eyes, and see nothing else.

seanhunter just for one minute stop and think. People of all genders have been discriminated against for nearly all of time.
I won't pretend to understand the many gender types I don't.
But what I do understand is that we are showing more kindness to those that gender isn't easily defined, and that can only be a good thing.
When you saw people falling off those planes you saw that as the decline of the western world . REALLY ?

Sharemarket, I get some of what you say, and share your concerns on the planet.
However as we spread wealth around the world, birthrates decline, today in the news is a story that in the UK the population is falling.
We are not redefining what a woman is, we are redefining what people are, and biology and gender are turning out to be more complicated than people like you and I understand.
The scary thing that no one is looking at is the link between increase mental illness and the increased use of cannabis, the governments first attack on mental illness should be an attack on drug dealers.
What's the point of increasing mental health services with one policy and then increasing the number of people that need them with another policy.
On green issues we will get there, the evidence is overwhelming only the ill informed or the unintelligent believe otherwise.
So we we see a greater focus on green issues around the world, as it's the intelligent leading the debate.

seanhunter what a depressing post.
It's the natural way of things that old people think their ways are right and young people strive to shape the world in their image.
As the Germans say, the young are the future.
We will always have challenges in the world, today is no different.
We just have to be accepting as we get older and trust the next generation.
It will be all right, but different.
When you think that the world is going to pot, then it doesn't mean it is, it just means you have got old.

Mathersfinger trades get balanced over a period of time, some days you get more sells than buys and the price goes up, and vica versa.
What you say is generally true, but with the volume so low we have a situation where small movements cause a drop or rise.
I believe the situation is a lot of the shares in issue is being sat on.
I am sitting on my shares and so are lots of others, and of course the main holders.
So we have less shares to trade.
Now if we had volume then the price would even out and we would get a more realistic price.
However we are at PEA and that means we get a small percentage of what this is worth, so probably at the moment 30 pence a share is roughly correct as we are only valued on NPV.
I do believe that the PFS will change things, but as we get MRE's on other targets that will add to the NPV, but as it's a MRE, we will only get a small percentage of that translated into the share price.
If someone buys a few million shares a day then we start to level out.
We just are not getting the volume.
But as you say, you are happy with your evaluation, as I am with mine.

All the best.

Morning Mathersfinger, I do disagree with you on this point, this is just lack of volume, we have O trades as well as A trades.
We don't even trade 10 million shares a day, which would still be low.
We also have falling share prices globally today, although I doubt that is having much affect on Solgold.
It's the usual story, just no volume.

All the best.

Zoros the The tower of the cloth- and-shirt-foe makes about as much sense as your postings.

Then Zoros , ask your wife before posting.

Zoros when is the last time you have been to China, you are just repeating what the media says.
Go there, it's a completely different story.

Jerry I can see Taiwan and South Korea joining AUKUS, lets remember during the cold war Taiwan had American Nuclear missiles in Taiwan. They could have again.
I think over the years this may bring China into the mainstream.

Good morning DartFrog, your post while providing food for thought, leaves out some salient info.
We could never ask Russia to join the EU, because of their appalling human rights issues, and also the amount of debt Russia currently has. Not impossible in the future, if the grip Putin has disappears, and we get free elections.
As someone who has family in ex soviet block countries, I can tell you they would be horrified if Russia was allowed to join the EU, as it would completely destroy their security.
It's not just the threat of military action, but also the political regimes that exist in the host countries.
Look what is happening in Poland and Hungary, unless we in the west can understand that the mindset of these countries who were under soviet rule need time to fully evolve. We need another 20-30 years to allow these former Soviet states to adapt and become truly democratic.
On AUKUS, I welcome this. It has come at the right time. China are having problems feeding their population with high debt levels, and people starting to protest.
This is the worst time for China to confront AUKUS, as they cannot afford it.
I believe we will always have conflict and tension within the world, but the future of AUKUS may go somewhere to achieving a better balance, and hopefully less wars.

Zoros do you ever read and understand.
We had lots of info about the election only one party was against mining and they came third.
Why do you peddle these myths.
If you believed half of what you say, why on earth would you invest in Solgold.

Sorry Bubble just accept the one universal law in the universe that has stood the test of time.
Zoros is always wrong.
It doesn't matter who the next president is. Ecuador is establishing itself as a mining community.
Do you think, they will tear up all the legislation on mining because Zoros says so.
They won't, and besides we are expecting a PFS that that reportedly makes the development of Alpala cheaper and quicker.
Also worth mentioning that the quicker aspect is based on the 2025 figure, as that is Solgolds figure. Not long to wait for the PFS.

Addicknt Solgold are in constant discussions with the government.
We know this because When the mining minister asked what could be done to get projects to production faster. NM replied speed up the issuing of licenses.
Also we have a licence at each stage and it can lapse if we take too long. So we only have so long to bring Alpala to production. Hence we have to keep the government updated. Whereas I agree with you is that it keeps Solgold pushing this forward to production, so we can complete it within the timeframe required.

Understand LunchMoney, I am also aware that we don't agree on other aspects either.
But I find you a considerate poster. Who is of independent thought, and expresses yourself better than I do, and is not led by fantasy, and can interpret the information we are given for all sources, and support your arguments. So few of us do on here. Had I pointed out that it came from the government, every uninformed poster would have jumped on me saying. "Well they would have to say that".
Whereas a respected poster such as yourself can say it. And it's accepted by all parties. Thank you.

Correct LunchMoney, the likes of Zoros continue to insult and misinform. It has always been 2025. No one has said any different. Yes the PFS had to be redone. But when the 2028 or 2029 date were talked about, that was for a full block cave operation. Time has passed, under 5 years to take Alpala to production.

Agreed Novice people often forget that as we build Alpala that our other tenements will continue to pass milestones at various stages over the next 4 years, and give support to the share price. Does that mean the end to fluctuations, of course not. But slowly we will underpin at a greater base. But once Alpala is built and revenue producing. Then the other tenements have much greater significance.

I did go away, I just came back.

I see your back with the insults Jerry.

You have a point novice, but my friends and I are very direct. So yes I would, but would probably choose my words more carefully.

My point Novice is RK has misrepresented me and he is treated on here like some sort of Guru.
I always apoligise when wrong, he just continues with the snide remarks.