Member Info for Quady

Don't disagree ssmith_trader in my reply to ShaketMare , I admitted it could be wrong to ignore what Irwin says, but added my reasons for ignoring him.

May I just add something on Irwin, he's says We are going to be sold and then gives no details.
Many on here would say to me, what would I expect as he isn't allowed to give details.
But if you stop and think, then that cannot be true.
If Irwin can say it, then Solgold can. As I explained we have said it on 20 tenements, but we have also said we are bringing Cascabel to production. Irwin wouldn't even say we are selling, if he was bound by any confidential agreement. So I personally don't find him a good source of information.

Sharketmare, you are correct on Irwin as I have ignored everything he has said, and that may turn out to be wrong. However I have taken this approach because I see Irwin as bigging up CGP at the expense of Solgold. I haven't accepted everything Solgold has said, as I explained I was annoyed and surprised when they eventually explained that they had to redo the PFS completely, as opposed to amending it.
But I am more accepting than most, and come to the conclusion it is what it is, and like everyone on here could have sold out or carried on with my investment. Once I had calmed down, and reassessed, I decided that the fundamental reasons I had invested haven't changed and over time have improved, so happy to stay invested.

I think the word you are looking for is consistent Novice. Remember addkcknt and Redknight said it was impossible for Solgold to take Alpala to production, and insisted I didn't know what I was talking about. Remember they said impossible, not unlikely. Now Redknight has shifted his position and addkcknt hasn't. The real reason Redknight says he has filtered me is so I can't remind him of this, and so he doesn't have to answer any embarrassing questions. But make your own mind up. Yes I am in the minority, but have been consistently correct. I have never been guilty of group think or conspiracy theories.
Lastly I would like to answer one of addicknts more ridiculous assertions that some people on here are taken in by.
He says just because I am consistently right about no bid, doesn't mean I will be right in the future.
My answer is addicknt just because you have been consistently wrong, doesn't mean your be right in the future.
For the record, I have never said that we will never get a bid, but that the most likely outcome is we go to production. I still maintain that, but should the book become less diverse and we get some consolidation on the share register, then I will rethink my position based on who owns what.

Morning Sharketmare, I agree I listen to the company, but I make sure the evidence supports what they are saying. If you remember I spoke out about the delay of the PFS and was as shocked as anyone when they eventually explained the reason, while Redknight and others where saying it was we where expecting a bid. That was based on zero evidence.
As for your point, do I expect to advertise if Alpala is up for sale or JV. The answer would be yes, if it was. I Base this on that they are advertising 20 tenements up for sale or JV and they are advertising this. I am sorry but these are just the facts, people have been saying we going to be sold every week since hole 5 at Alpala. But few understand why we haven't, and a lot has to change for a bid to be successful. People avoid the fact BHP want discoveries cheap. How do we know this. Well BHP have said so.
The problem we have is some people on here think everyone is lying to fix in with their world view, and taken in by certain posters.
We have Redknight who continuously tells us he's in the know, as you read one of his monologues he tells you what everybody knows and chucks in a guess or two, and when his guesses are wrong, blames Solgold for telling him. Like he is apparently annoyed at Solgold about the appointment of a CEO. He knows no more than the rest of us. I am not bothered if it's 2025 or 2026, I just pointed out the anomaly. As maybe someone had some thoughts on the subject. After reading people's thoughts I tend to agree that Maybe Solgold said 2025 to the government, and for all sorts of reasons this has now slipped to 2026, but again Redknight makes a big thing about this, even though he has filtered me and not reading my posts. He is a blowhard that enjoys his own importance.

All the best.

All the best Patrm
Just finish this subject in 2012 Professor Ereditato resigned because his experiments in light speed were wrong.
The link I posted was Cern 2015 when they proved him correct.
Agreed back to Solgold.

Listen to the videos that autoplay after the one that I posted Patrm.
It was not debunked it was the start of understanding that Bohrs theories were correct.

For your interest Patrm
Niels Bohr predicted this and in 2015 Cern proved him correct.

Video below.

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=photons+travel+500+times+the+speed+of+light+explaned&&view=detail&mid=1B76864D12BCD598246A1B76864D12BCD598246A&&FORM=VRDGAR&ru=%2Fvideos%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dphotons%2520travel%2520500%2520times%2520the%2520speed%2520of%2520light%2520explaned%26qs%3Dn%26form%3DQBVR%26sp%3D-1%26pq%3Dphotons%2520travel%2520500%2520times%2520the%2520speed%2520of%2520light%2520explaned%26sc%3D0-52%26sk%3D%26cvid%3DB1C431C3912B433B870740B3C8EF0A67

It's not trickery Patrm , There is a book called Quantum if starts with Max Planck in the year 1900 and takes you through the birth to modern day Quantum physics. Most of the book is the disagreements between Niels Bohr and Albert Einsten.
Einsten once said " if Bohr is correct then I know nothing. Bohr turned out to be correct.
The trickery you refer too is this.

Energy = mass times the speed of light squared.
So as you get closer to the speed of light your mass becomes infinite.
However what the experiment does is use Photons which have zero mass.
This is the start of Quantum computing using Bohrs principles.

Good grief that article was written in 2010 Zoros , however then Quantum entanglement was not useless as we had already started down the path to Quantum computing.

Zoros it's been done with Photons you can accelerate them 500 times faster than light and it doesn't break the rule that nothing can travel faster than light. this is because of the mass involved.
Even if you have a basic understanding of particle physics you can work this out.

We have a conflict of information.

QUITO, Sept 17 (Reuters) - Ecuador expects four major mining
projects to start production by the end of President Guillermo
Lasso's first term in 2025, as the conservative leader seeks to
diversify the economy before oil exports, the natural resources
ministry said on Friday.

Lasso, a former banker who took office in May, is seeking to
attract private investment to boost the economy after a deep
recession last year exacerbated the government's cash crunch.
Ecuador has abundant mineral reserves, but has lagged Andean
neighbors Peru and Chile in developing large-scale mines.

Three gold concessions to Canadian firms - Dundee Precious
Metals' Loma Larga, Atico Mining Corp's La
Plata, and Adventus Mining Corp's Curipamba - are in
the advanced exploration stage and should begin production in
2023, the Energy and Non-Renewable Natural Resources Ministry
said in its statement.

The Cascabel concession, controlled by Australia's SolGold
PLC, is expected to begin copper production in 2025,
the ministry added.

SharketMare that's not true, it's how some on here try to give me a label.
I form my opinions on what the company says and the accompanying evidence.
On the 17th September 2021 Lasso said he expects 4 companies to be producing and one of them is Solgold's Cascabel.
So we have a conflict of information.

Something is wrong as Solgold saying production in 2026 and Lasso saying 2025.
Also PFS is meant to be cheaper and quicker.
Not sure which one if any is correct.

Can't answer that one Jerry, and completely get why people are disappointed by the speed of progress.
However it will take as long as it takes and I am sure we will get there.

addicknt I am not a professor and I am sure his reasoning is correct.
But I have been lucky enough to work at the forefront of Technology and be privy to some of the things yet to come in computing.
The one thing I have learnt is we always get their faster than we think.
I am currently looking at the Biotech industry as always thinking about what will happen in the next 10 years.
Some of the science is both amazing and terrifying.

It can be done Woody and it doesn't break Einstein theory as we approach the speed of light we get infinite mass.
The link below shows us that in the year 2000 we broke the speed limit by going 300 times faster.
By the end of 2000 they had exceeded it by 500 times, but cannot find that link.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/841690.stm

Fusion reactor will be here sooner than we think, the rare Earth minerals required for the Magnets are a problem .
France is constructing the Hot plasma chamber which will reach a temp ten times hotter than the sun.
I believe we will se this in our lifetime.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jul/28/worlds-largest-nuclear-fusion-project-under-assembly-in-france

The caesium gas chamber part exists and we can accelerate photons up to 500 times the speed of light and a photon can arrive at it's destination before it leaves.
This was accomplished in the year 2000.