Member Info for Quady

Slug as novicehunter has said your comment on the two last summers, shows you understand nothing about climate change.

What has any summer got to do with climate change.

You really are a complete imbecile.

To answer your question fully Simplyme.

We have extremely accurate data since 1800.

This cannot be disputed.

However we use other means to calculate millions of years ago, through spectrometry and co2 trapped in layer's of ice and frozen wasteland.

Also we can extract information through the fossil record by carbon dating, and reverse engineer levels.

Good morning simplyme.

That's simple.

Ice ages have only existed when co2 was between 0.02 and 0.03 as a percentage of the atmosphere.

Yes we had more trees millions of year's ago, when humans didn't exist, and of course we had more trees when humans started out.

But that is nothing to do with co2 levels.

Plants don't need much co2 and even at today's levels crops in the world are dying, because plants depending on species can only thrive between certain temperatures.

Today the heat caused by the man made element is already contributing towards crop failure and it's getting worse.

You are a complete imbecile slug.

It was five times higher when the earth was cooling.

No human life existed.

That's not an argument.

You are a complete imbecile.

However this article explains why people like you are imbeciles.

Try reading it if you can.

The science is undeniable.

https://www.sciencealert.com/co2-is-only-a-tiny-part-of-our-atmosphere-but-it-has-a-huge-influence-here-s-why

I was correct Slug you have no idea how to calculate the man made element.

You keep repeating the same old rubbish.

Even if you understand mathematics you would know what you have said is complete rubbish.

I asked how the man made element was calculated.

But first let me correct the lies you just put up.

Co2 is 0.0425 now to a complete imbecile that doesn't sound a lot until you understand what that means.

Since humans existed co2 has been between 0.02 and 0.03 , so from the higher figure which is not how it's calculated it's about 40% man made.

However when you understand that the highest figure is not used, then you would understand that the man made element is nearly 50% of all co2

Yes the 0.04 is always quoted by imbeciles that don't understand the mathematics.

But what you also failed to understand is 0.04 is dangerously high, and currently 0.0425 and increasing.

Original question stands how is the man made element calculated.

I doubt you can Google this, you need to read the mathematics.

I suggest you start with the NOAA databases and the NASA scientists who according to you, know less than you do.

This is just one of many reasons you are the most unintelligent poster on here.

Good luck

He too stupid to be a mathematician.

If he was a mathematician, he would understand how to calculate the man made element of climate change and be able to explain it.

He doesn't understand anything about the world we inhabit.

Thank you for your feedback Pbow.

Good morning Pbow.

I am not a civil engineer, just to repeat in case someone hasn't read the first message from me.

I believe that the support for the roof is covered, but also ground is sterilised, so that construction above ground doesn't add any downward pressure on the construction.

So less cost.

I believe we had an RNS some time ago and that was what made me look into sterilised land around the mine.

However anyone who is involved in the construction of mines today, has block caving experience, and my posts on this subject is to show people on here, that Solgold can build a block cave operation if it has the money, as civil engineers can provide the expertise and know how and the scare stories on this forum are just that.

There are scare stories, as it doesn't match their world view that Solgold must sell, because it's impossible for them to go to production.

Pbow I have also worked in engineering for 35 years.

However not civil engineering.

Block cave mining although more expensive to implement becomes cheaper to operate because of ESG which is widespread.

One of the big costs is dealing with the waste material.

With block caving this is massively cheaper, because less waste, less man hours, less transport cost, also able to target the high grade concentrate in the initial time period.

Please read the article I posted and the evidence that backs up the article.

As a civil engineer I believe most on this forum would appreciate your views and the details, including me.

I have just posted the evidence that shows little risk with block cave mining, also any company that is involved in the construction of mines can block cave mine.

It is not a risky prospect. In fact it simplifies lots of problems, for example the disposal of huge amounts of waste.

Once up and running the operation costs are less than panel, open cut and open pit mining.

Everyone is going this way.

So when the imbeciles led by slug say we cannot build a block cave operation, you know that they are lying or just unaware of the huge advantages that block cave mining offers.

Https://papers.acg.uwa.edu.au/p/2063_10_van%20As/

Slug again you prove yourself to be the most unintelligent poster on here.

Any civil engineering company that undertakes mine construction can construct a block cave operation.

You're like a child, it has to be spelt out for you and.

Good grief coloneldrake has no idea, any civil engineering company can build a new block cave mine.

Good grief anyone can see Redknight is a fraud.

So many people on here have told him what an automatic trade is and how they work.

But he still talks about Autobots.

Maybe he has filtered everyone who is knowledgeable about such matters and so will never understand automatic trades or maybe he's a fraud as this is pretty basic stuff if you want to buy stocks and shares.

Yes slug the way to stop it is hit the top row with the word options in.

However I just suspect you cannot spell .

BBG what the hell is wrong with you.

You really are not quite all there.

Slug only thinks I am a moron, but everyone can see Slug is a rac.ist and hates women.

Slug what they plan to make illegal is intimidation of women and making them feel unsafe and to stop the language that makes them afraid to go out.

I know this may upset you, but I fully support the proposed legislation.

Appreciate your opinion novicehunter however the use of the word Twronk is not illegal.

Hatred of women and hate speech against women, is up for debate in parliament and about to become law, as no one is opposing it

BUYSELLREPEAT, you are also not quite right.

I put that out last week.

Look at my posting history.