Member Info for Quady

This slug is why you are the leading imbecile on here.

Private money nothing to do with Trump.

https://www.ecoticias.com/en/largest-project-begun-solar-panels-america/6720/#:~:text=52%20billion%20solar%20panels%20could,highways%20covered%20with%20solar%20panels.

Again Slug you are 100% wrong.

Look what is being discussed in the USA.

Solar panels yes one installation of 52 billion solar panels.

Yes that's billion not million for one project.

Oh dear needalife or should I say earthling.

You invested here on the advice of others.

Now you are bitter because you need the money and so you turn on investors in this share.

You really shouldn't invest.

As you clearly don't understand what you are doing.

Needalife still waiting for the post that says addicknt used the term poorly paid.

I take it that you lied.

So let me get this right needalife you have just posted showing you lied and asked me to take note.

Nowhere in that post does poorly paid occur.

So you remain a liar.

You're welcome addicknt.

He is ridiculous.

I think this is earthling in another guise.

If it is, then the most clueless poster on this forum is back.

Needalife I suggest you do go back and find the message that addicknt uses the term poorly paid.

The reason I say this is I probably look at this forum more than most.

So I know you are a liar.

He has never said poorly paid.

I am not a trader, I have done in the past, but found it caused many sleepless nights for small profits.

I originally bought just over 1.8 million shares at an average of 4.6 pence.

I should have sold at 46 pence but didn't.

However I sold 600,000 between 30-35 pence a share so am already in profit.

I have just over 1.2 million left.

I am holding for the outcome.

Eloro the story is the same.

If we get a good price, we will sell, if we cannot we will build it.

Your position should be based on what you personally think is most likely.

Richer sure I don't have as much as I did, but I have recouped all the money I invested and have a free carry with 1.2 million shares.

So I understand how investment works.

You follow the story not the share price.

As I have said many times you need to know why you have invested and keep an eye on your investment.

If you are happy with what we have, then all is fine.

If not sell and buy something else.

Eloro if I may say you are unhappy because of the share price.

Scott has done everything we have asked of him and more.

Sure he can be replaced.

But to my mind that's not desirable.

He has no control on the share price.

Raising the rest of the finance to build and starting construction would I believe pay dividends.

Good afternoon Eloro.

They are not experts.

I have been investing for 44 year's now .

People like Slug, Redknight and DBW are clueless, they just like the sound of their own voice.

The problem with sites like this is anyone can pretend to be anyone.

I believe we will have a positive outcome.

But I have never put a time on it, because no one knows.

Eloro we have had stacks of news.

Sure this is going to take time to play out.

But we are funded.

Have 40% of the build cost and are completing permitting and licensing.

As for the share price, what do you expect.

We are sitting on concessions but are not generating income.

This needs to either be sold or built.

It's going to take time, as we have no bidders and we need to move forward.

It will be vastly different in five years time.

I have voted for the incumbents.

Mathersfinger it is you who has constantly lied and been caught out.

Nothing I have said is incorrect on peer review, but either you don't comprehend what I have said.

Or I have disturbed your blinkered world view and you cannot cope, so resort to pretending you don't understand.

Please filter me, as you are ridiculous.

Mathersfinger you are making a reverse point.

The whole point of peer review is it's held up to scrutiny.

I have never said that every peer review is accurate.

You are saying that I have said that or implying it.

That makes you a liar.

Peer review is to present.

Jezzoo I don't use any tricks I am just honest and I can check facts.

It's that simple.

Jezzoo you know I am mildly dyslexic.

So part of my problem is I read fast and process fast.

If you use double talk, you are not being clever, you are being nasty.

At least hopefully you have a better idea what peer review is and isn't.

Agreed Italian.

This stuff takes time.

I have been here some time and barely anyone on here understands that we are talking about years not weeks or months.

A lot still has to happen and we have to be content with the timeline we are presented with.

Jezzoo I don't think everything is biased.

Peer review makes sure it's not biased, because its purpose is to allow questioning to confirm or rufute.

How on earth can that be biased.

That's ridiculous.